I'm new on this forum, its nice and very enlightening. On this topic, i'd prefer KCB and NIC to Equity as a good investment option. Why?
1. A large proportion of a financial institution's income is from interest which is mostly accrued and not received as of the time of closing the books. Thus as an ordinary shareholder and a depositor, protection lies with the fixed assets of the the company. Apart from the building at upperhill, what other assets does it hold? (others would argue vehicles 'depreciated in 5yrs', other branch buildings 'leased, the asset being the lease and not the building') the other assets 'investments' are held at market value dependent on fluctuations. Check its FS.
2. Remember the recession, the industry and who it affected, does lehman brothers, citigroup sound familiar....
3. If say i just pass more than 5billion through your bank every month, hw much would you make in interest if you invested it in a risk free investment. Who's got the financial muscle to have that kind of cash? 'political risk'
3. What would you rather have, 1million people with a cashflow of 10,000 pm or 10,000 people with a cashflow of1million pm in an economy where still more than half the populatiom lives under the poverty line and month on month inflation at times rises to 10%?
4. When you think of asset financing NIC and DTB comes to mind, corporate banking CBA, BBK, Stanchart, Stanbic, low int. corp loans citibank. Equity tried and failed. Sustainability.
5. If you started a business today, why would you go to equity? Is it to get a loan or for other services? And when your business expands would you stick with them?
'They say money cannot buy me happiness but when i compare when i had none and now, i'm happier' Kevin O'leary