radiomast wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:radiomast wrote:kaka2za wrote:
Really? Kikuyus managed to displace Maasais from most areas in present Central Province /Central Rift while Kisiis managed to break the Nilotic belt in Nyanza and South Rift.
Kisiis were already in Nyanza before Luos arrived. I am not sure what you mean by saying Kisiis broke the nilotic belt in South Rift.
Not quite. For more than 100 years, the Masai protected the hinterland of East Africa from Ottoman and Arabic slave raiders. The thing that did the Masai in were a) riderpest and b) the Masai themselves, through internecine civil war.
Maasai's protected the hinterland. But they did not occupy it. In fact Maasais's historically never stayed in one place. They were constantly on the move
That is true.
Nevertheless, their reputation as fearless fighters kept many intruders (including Bazungu explorers) from crossing Masailiand.
The Masai do 'occupy' the land, but their concept of ownership is very different from Bantu agriculturalists - basically summarized in that nomadic belief that: "the land (specifically anything that grows on the surface), belongs to the cow."
The fact that the Masai roam widely does not imply lack of ownership. After all they named every inch and would fight to protect grazing grounds from intruders, especially if there animals are threatened. Granted they will not bother to secure title, as a Kikuyu would, for instance, believing that the cow does it for them.
"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)