wazua Sat, Apr 25, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

6 Pages«<23456>
Gay Marriages
annsal
#31 Posted : Tuesday, July 27, 2010 5:12:35 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 12/18/2009
Posts: 316
Location: nairobi
@ nanfor1 you are just the bomb.Laughing out loudly. umewaweza kweli.
God loves a Trier!
willin2learn
#32 Posted : Tuesday, July 27, 2010 5:56:11 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 2/12/2008
Posts: 1,178
@Masukuma,

Not to worry. The winner of that rumble is in RED glovesApplause Applause Applause
murchr
#33 Posted : Friday, May 24, 2019 4:00:21 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/26/2012
Posts: 15,980


"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
Impunity
#34 Posted : Sunday, May 26, 2019 10:19:01 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,331
Location: Masada
murchr wrote:




But the same colonial guys have now legalize it in their backyard...what a twist!
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.

hardwood
#35 Posted : Monday, May 27, 2019 1:28:12 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/28/2015
Posts: 9,562
Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
Why would a man want to eat a fellow man instead of eating "fish"? Even in the wild male beasts eat female beasts coz that is how the good Lord created nature. Man should never sink to a level lower than beasts.
T-Bag
#36 Posted : Monday, May 27, 2019 9:31:39 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 9/25/2008
Posts: 510
youcan'tstopusnow wrote:
Wendz wrote:
nostoppingthis wrote:
Original :

NO PERSON SHALL BE ALLOWED TO MARRY A PERSON OF THE SAME SEX

CoE version/proposed constitution:

EVERY ADULT HAS THE RIGHT TO MARRY A PERSON OF THE OPPOSITE SEX

What was the need to make this change? Ruto might just be right here, "It allows gay marriages" d'oh!

What do you guys think?


EVERY ADULT HAS THE RIGHT TO MARRY A PERSON OF THE OPPOSITE SEX

Please someone educate me in simple layman's language how this allows gay marriages.


Wendz, by switcing those 2 statements, it means that the proposed constitution has not expressly stated that one is not allowed to marry a person of the same sex. Believe me, a few years down the line, there will be a case in court arguing that gay marriage is constitutional (and how right they will be) KURA LAKINI BADO NI YES!


The right has been given but the constitution does not force anyone to exercise that right, however, denying a person that right violates the constitution, kindly note therefore that not exercising the said right has not been explicitly outlawed.... not exercising that right takes the forms of celibacy, transgender marriage, intersex marriage, polygamy/polyandry, etc.... in most African cultures barren women have been marrying fellow women.... it is Abrahamic religions that have a different view
I AM trust in GOD, I AM belief in THYSELF
sparkly
#37 Posted : Monday, May 27, 2019 9:58:58 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 9/23/2009
Posts: 8,083
Location: Enk are Nyirobi
Impunity wrote:
murchr wrote:




But the same colonial guys have now legalize it in their backyard...what a twist!


High Court cannot amend laws, only parliament can. The petitioners chose the wrong forum. They should lobby parliament to repeal s 162.
Life is short. Live passionately.
masukuma
#38 Posted : Monday, May 27, 2019 10:42:19 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/4/2006
Posts: 13,823
Location: Nairobi
How things change... While I started this thread and I don't agree with the guy who started it!
All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
Angelica _ann
#39 Posted : Monday, May 27, 2019 10:48:24 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/7/2012
Posts: 11,937
masukuma wrote:
How things change... While I started this thread and I don't agree with the guy who started it!


smile smile smile I think you have answered me. I have read your contribution on this thread and they seem not to be in sync with what you advocate for nowadays. Things changed or your thinking changed!!!
In the business world, everyone is paid in two coins - cash and experience. Take the experience first; the cash will come later - H Geneen
FRM2011
#40 Posted : Monday, May 27, 2019 2:06:15 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 11/5/2010
Posts: 2,459
A lawyer friend was explaining to me that this court case is too much noise over nothing.

Apparently, the words "sex against the order of nature" would include oral sex as well.

Secondly, it's a crime almost impossible to prove in court. There was a judge who had ordered suspects to be medically examined to determine whether they had engaged in gay sex.

It's the same judge who had acquitted a guy who had defiled a 13-year old because, she seemed to have enjoyed the sex.

Both his outrageous rulings were overturned by the appeal court.
6 Pages«<23456>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.