Welcome to team Yawn😃

I have no sympathy for the Governor,I just want to see if what has been prosecuted in the public holds in the Court of Law
Really unfortunate that Sharon died,but she lived a very risky life. All would be well if she had spent time studying rather than sleeping around and wishing that she would get a 20M house in Lavington by chasing old men.

DPP only need to prove that he procured his aides to commit the murder therefore an accesory to the murder.

The post by @l0lest and Euge are the most plausible accounts of events that may nail Obado

They talk of a bald man = Ombeta can claim Obado is not bald. For someone to call you bald in the dark it clearly means you have no hair.

Communication with the suspects on phone doesn't prove much, you could have been sending me messages while you are committing the acts.

What will nail Obado, remember the prosecution has to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt.

1. Money transfers for procured services - that can be an uphill to prove Obado can claim that he was giving a loan etc.

2. BTS data. Even if your phones location settings are off, your cell phone registers it's self on the nearest cell tower ensuring that you never miss a call. So the DCI can get this data from Safcom or any other mobile subscribers out there. Ombeta on the other hand can claim Obados phone was stolen, depending on how Obado acted on that eventful day , a lost phone can introduce doubt to a claim.

Now if the DCI does not have enough evidence a mistrial might happen, then trying him again can almost be impossible because Ombeta will claim double jeopardy.

Think about it

I am writing this from Migori and I can tell you that his fate at grassroots level is sealed.. No acquittal can appease the disquiet in the village. People are angry here

Oh my! The worst we saw in our days was Carol Mutoko smoking at Rugby matches at UoN.

That is a none issue wata tulia. The bottom line is the prosecutor needs to prove his case

obado mandazis

https://opera.pulselive....o-mandazi-id8883668.html

those are probably theories that kaka2za's first year law students would come up with. and that is why they are still in first year. coz their legal 'reasoning' is all bullshit.
for a start if your phone is linked to a crime and it is conveniently 'stolen' after the fact without you having reported it stolen before you realise what shit you are in then you can't use the stolen line. forget about the fact that the bts data will show that the stolen phone also went home with you. lets not get started on money transfer to killers being loans.
on bald men, assuming the stories are true, if the witnesses identification of obado were not based on recognition then an identification parade was probably held.

Note in my assumptions I noted that depending on how Obado acted. We lose phones and choose to move on with no report to the police but ofcourse if the BTS stations continuedto show the movement to his home or wherever else he went to then he's nailed.

Its now upto the DPP.

get you now. and i agree.