tycho wrote:AlphDoti wrote:tycho wrote:masukuma wrote:Survival is for the fittest... the fittest creature to do the following in large successions
1) eat
2) out run enemies or have no enemies
3) breed
That's it! if your intelligence does not help you do all the above... pole sana!
If true, then why humanity? Start with the difference in brain structure.
I see an agenda to brainwash people that having one or no child means you are high IQ. The bigger objective to reduce human population... the end goal
IQ is so misused in popular culture/'fiction'! Malthus is Spencer and kinda Darwin...
Could the reason for this be the
sustaining of oppressive living conditions by a blind elite?
Self preservation. 100yrs from today will be irrelevant to me_just live and die gracefully and before your eyes not to anyone's eyes, procreation is a duty and success of your progeny is bound to be determined by the environment and an arry of other varriants beyond your control, including their "Free will and deviancy to be unique and different from a perception of historical expossures, experiences and value systems", and hence succession is nonsensical. Just like a poor Congolese born in a land of bounty can not experience that privilege, so could be your progeny be soon you part ways, once dead or out of the scenes if they don't learn to adapt-be a master of ur environment like camileon, better than you did.
,Behold, a sower went forth to sow;....