Wazua
»
Investor
»
Economy
»
Nakumatt: Another ailing Kenyan company
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/23/2009 Posts: 14,323 Location: nairobi
|
pops wrote:Still trying to understand what exactly nakumatt strategy is. Someone enlighten me please.
1. Why would tuskys want to take 51% of Nakumatt. What would they gain apart from 51% of a 40 billion of debt? Surely that's like throwing good money after bad? No other investor is willing to to touch them so why Tuskys?
2. Wouldn't it be easier for the owners of Nakumatt to be declared insolvent and wound up? Why are they intent on dragging this charade on? Nakumatt has lost credibility so it's brand is worthless now. Even if things were good and they made 1 billion profit every year, it will take decades to pay its creditors back! Surely that brand cannot be worthless COOP, IMH, KEGN, KQ, MTNU
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/4/2009 Posts: 10,820 Location: NAIROBI
|
http://www.businessdaily...62946-p20qvrz/index.htmlWealth is built through a relatively simple equation
Wealth=Income + Investments - Lifestyle
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 11/5/2010 Posts: 2,459
|
pops wrote:Still trying to understand what exactly nakumatt strategy is. Someone enlighten me please.
1. Why would tuskys want to take 51% of Nakumatt. What would they gain apart from 51% of a 40 billion of debt? Surely that's like throwing good money after bad? No other investor is willing to to touch them so why Tuskys?
2. Wouldn't it be easier for the owners of Nakumatt to be declared insolvent and wound up? Why are they intent on dragging this charade on? Nakumatt has lost credibility so it's brand is worthless now. Even if things were good and they made 1 billion profit every year, it will take decades to pay its creditors back! I have just seen an analysis by someone online. What they owe is much much more than the value of their entire inventory at their peak when fully stocked. In short, the 40Bn didn't go to buy stocks, its stashed somewhere. Why Tuskys ? They couldn't trust anyone else to come on board. Who else would keep quiet once they discover the hidden skeletons ? If the deal goes through, they simply come back with tuskys as their front using money they screwed the banks and suppliers.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 4/16/2014 Posts: 1,420 Location: Bohemian Grove
|
obiero wrote:pops wrote:Still trying to understand what exactly nakumatt strategy is. Someone enlighten me please.
1. Why would tuskys want to take 51% of Nakumatt. What would they gain apart from 51% of a 40 billion of debt? Surely that's like throwing good money after bad? No other investor is willing to to touch them so why Tuskys?
2. Wouldn't it be easier for the owners of Nakumatt to be declared insolvent and wound up? Why are they intent on dragging this charade on? Nakumatt has lost credibility so it's brand is worthless now. Even if things were good and they made 1 billion profit every year, it will take decades to pay its creditors back! Surely that brand cannot be worthless Its not worthless,it has a negative value like KQ.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 4/22/2010 Posts: 11,522 Location: Nairobi
|
whiteowl wrote:obiero wrote:pops wrote:Still trying to understand what exactly nakumatt strategy is. Someone enlighten me please.
1. Why would tuskys want to take 51% of Nakumatt. What would they gain apart from 51% of a 40 billion of debt? Surely that's like throwing good money after bad? No other investor is willing to to touch them so why Tuskys?
2. Wouldn't it be easier for the owners of Nakumatt to be declared insolvent and wound up? Why are they intent on dragging this charade on? Nakumatt has lost credibility so it's brand is worthless now. Even if things were good and they made 1 billion profit every year, it will take decades to pay its creditors back! Surely that brand cannot be worthless Its not worthless,it has a negative value like KQ. lol....  @ Obiero will eat you alive...KQ is going places. possunt quia posse videntur
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/23/2009 Posts: 14,323 Location: nairobi
|
maka wrote:whiteowl wrote:obiero wrote:pops wrote:Still trying to understand what exactly nakumatt strategy is. Someone enlighten me please.
1. Why would tuskys want to take 51% of Nakumatt. What would they gain apart from 51% of a 40 billion of debt? Surely that's like throwing good money after bad? No other investor is willing to to touch them so why Tuskys?
2. Wouldn't it be easier for the owners of Nakumatt to be declared insolvent and wound up? Why are they intent on dragging this charade on? Nakumatt has lost credibility so it's brand is worthless now. Even if things were good and they made 1 billion profit every year, it will take decades to pay its creditors back! Surely that brand cannot be worthless Its not worthless,it has a negative value like KQ. lol.... @ Obiero will eat you alive...KQ is going places. @maka I don’t have time for such characters. the clown clearly hasn’t read project safari circular. KQ is no longer on negative equity COOP, IMH, KEGN, KQ, MTNU
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 4/16/2014 Posts: 1,420 Location: Bohemian Grove
|
obiero wrote:maka wrote:whiteowl wrote:obiero wrote:pops wrote:Still trying to understand what exactly nakumatt strategy is. Someone enlighten me please.
1. Why would tuskys want to take 51% of Nakumatt. What would they gain apart from 51% of a 40 billion of debt? Surely that's like throwing good money after bad? No other investor is willing to to touch them so why Tuskys?
2. Wouldn't it be easier for the owners of Nakumatt to be declared insolvent and wound up? Why are they intent on dragging this charade on? Nakumatt has lost credibility so it's brand is worthless now. Even if things were good and they made 1 billion profit every year, it will take decades to pay its creditors back! Surely that brand cannot be worthless Its not worthless,it has a negative value like KQ. lol.... @ Obiero will eat you alive...KQ is going places. @maka I don’t have time for such characters. the clown clearly hasn’t read project safari circular. KQ is no longer on negative equity @Obiero You're a good stock analyst except when it come to KQ.Being married to a stock can cloud your judgement.As for the negative equity,not even a miracle can get them out of that blackhole that fast.They have a long way to go.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/23/2009 Posts: 14,323 Location: nairobi
|
whiteowl wrote:obiero wrote:maka wrote:whiteowl wrote:obiero wrote:pops wrote:Still trying to understand what exactly nakumatt strategy is. Someone enlighten me please.
1. Why would tuskys want to take 51% of Nakumatt. What would they gain apart from 51% of a 40 billion of debt? Surely that's like throwing good money after bad? No other investor is willing to to touch them so why Tuskys?
2. Wouldn't it be easier for the owners of Nakumatt to be declared insolvent and wound up? Why are they intent on dragging this charade on? Nakumatt has lost credibility so it's brand is worthless now. Even if things were good and they made 1 billion profit every year, it will take decades to pay its creditors back! Surely that brand cannot be worthless Its not worthless,it has a negative value like KQ. lol.... @ Obiero will eat you alive...KQ is going places. @maka I don’t have time for such characters. the clown clearly hasn’t read project safari circular. KQ is no longer on negative equity @Obiero You're a good stock analyst except when it come to KQ.Being married to a stock can cloud your judgement.As for the negative equity,not even a miracle can get them out of that blackhole that fast.They have a long way to go. @whiteowl please read the entire circular to get an update on why the shares is rallying. or page 17 only incase you need to understand the negative equity effects http://www.winda.co.ke/projectsafari.pdf COOP, IMH, KEGN, KQ, MTNU
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/4/2009 Posts: 10,820 Location: NAIROBI
|
Tuskys purchase of the stake will be through pumping money to pay creditors and suppliers including mall owners and restocking of the branches. Wealth is built through a relatively simple equation
Wealth=Income + Investments - Lifestyle
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/26/2007 Posts: 6,514
|
Ericsson wrote:KulaRaha wrote:Strategy is to go into administration. That halts them from paying old debts. Then try and restore the business without that burden.
Screw the banks and the suppliers. Banks can claim administration so no need to provide (or cook provisions). Suppliers will write off as cost of doing business.
Accept and move on. Its the Kenyan way... They are fearing going into oblivion coz all the branches may shut if things continue as they are and the brand erased. Going into administration is to shield the assets from being attached and sold by the the creditors, give more time to figure out how they can start repaying their debts I doubt they even care about repaying debts. Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Investor
»
Economy
»
Nakumatt: Another ailing Kenyan company
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|