The difference with the above examples and even France Macron who won during a run off had won by 66% which turnout was around 74%, the lowest for a run-off in almost 50 years in France.

The differences from the examples given is that;

1)They had no boycott just normal elections ie, they were no withdrawal of candidates etc

2)They weren't nullified elections

3)They didn't have any mistrust or lack of integrity issues in their electoral institutions.

4)They followed the rule of law and electoral regulations to the latter..

The case by case scenario is even more interesting, in other words very similar but way more DIFFERENT ISSUES than ours.

I think constitution & legal research fellows can really do us justice by describing the scenarios we have to deal with of (impliedly or actually) lowly (voters) elected president brings forth...

Ohhh. I now understand. I hope you are fine now.

Just why does Raila think that he is more special than all the other 7 presidential candidates? Also if he withdrew from the repeat election, why is he poking his filthy nose into the 26/10 election? Pilipili usio ila yakuwashiani?

Welcome to the new Kenya.

Where keyboard warriors rule. Jubilee bloggers are saying that they are revenging yesterday. Nasa bloggers are claiming mungiki are roaming the streets cutting people to pieces.

In short, fake news everywhere. Wazua keyboard warriors are very excited.

But let me show you the reality on the ground for the people who are now hiding in their rooms in Kawangware

I support freedom of expression. So continue expressing yourselves.

Kawangware, kangemi, uthiru are okuyu territory. Land of Mbari ya waiyaki & co. Why should they be intimidated by kavirodians who have traveled 400km from distant lands to terrorise them in their homeland? Enough is enough.