In the case filed at JSC there was a phonecall from Illuminati to the judges during the case saying how much was going to give them, they need another bloody story in Africa, seems they were supplying the "evidence".

Instead of the judges looking at the genuine and serialized forms that IEBC presented to court, the judges sub contracted the court registrar to go through the forms and make a report which they relied on for the judgement. Seems the registrar got forms from elsewhere and not those official ones presented by IEBC. But Njoki Ndungu actually went through the genuine forms and she confirmed everything was OK. This is the mother of all scandals and the SC may have to revise their ruling.

NB I also looked at all the form 34Bs uploaded by IEBC on their election website and all are in order. You can also check them out on the site. Here is the link.


https://public.rts.iebc....ke/results/results.html

.

if that is true, you only need damning verdict by a judicial commission of inquiry and almost the entire bench goes home, no questions asked

He was decisive then the court blamed him for nullifying the elections. So the courts need to be clear, the Maina Kiai case concluded that the results at the polling station are final. So he announced the results based on that. Now the SCORK in its detailed ruling said he violated the that same law and insisted that he should verify. So should he go back and tally all the forms 34A&Bs?

Chairman is seeking clarity, his being boss and macho might send us again to the debe. That is wisdom

Happening now...Unbelievable Chebukati showed up alone & is now being roasted by Senate at bill review committe. He came alone to represent the whole commission!!!!
Now you know the high handedness that's in iebc. He's about to be dismissed...go drying!!!!

To me this bill must pass... evidently.

I think it is the right thing to do...for one i believe the ruling in maina kiai case was too pedestrian when you consider the reality. My view is that if the national RO discovers inconsistency between Form 34As and B for particular constituency, he should send back to the constituency RO for correction. And the RO invites agents and interested parties to sign the corrected forms. That'a why you have 7 days to declare the result. For any court to rule that even if the national RO discovers errors in form 34Bs during verification he cannot change anything and he has to declare the wrong result and thereafter wait for court of law to change the same, that the national RO is just a mere conduit, is to make nonsense of civilization

There is a big difference between wisdom and just being indecisive. Being firm and bold in action does not mean that you do not seek counsel but you cannot allow a sense of anarchy descend on an organization by being weak. Weak leaders can also be very ruthless when they act out of fear.


Chebukati reminds me of President Charles Logan in the series 24. Gregory Itzin's performance in portraying President Logan is one of the greatest performances ever in the history of TV or Film. He is phenomenal in his portrayal of a leader who cannot make a decision that results in disastrous consequences.

Very precise prayer but 'veiled' goggles hinder understanding.