I am just asking myself, "Who has exhibited systematic failure in the process?" IEBC or SCOK?

@FundamentAli, fundamentally... without relitigating the case, after a quick read of judgement and Maina Kiai case, IEBC were a bit casual with the importance of process emphasized by role of Form 34A.

Generally speaking, it's quite common for young tech savvy chaps to frown on the demands of older folk. Reminds me of Bill Gates' petulance towards the judges in 'US vs Microsoft Corp' that saw Microsoft lose the case and very nearly broken up.

How else can you explain stubborn refusal to allow access to the servers, and @masukuma's review of the eventual charade provided?

The judges were emphatic that numbers don't matter, a diss at "tyranny of numbers ", but democracies are simply about MAJORITY RULE, the root and history of democracy must be unknown to this judges, in democratic history, it does not matter whether the majority are white, Kikuyu, republican, democrat, conservative, this theories are not contested in the vote but simply the numbers, improving society and ridding it of biases and etnic tyranny of mumbers is the leaderships problem and hence a political solution, and social one including discussion in wazua e.t.c, education, not a legalistic one, remember it was courts keeping Mandel in jail, Kenyatta in jail, jailing youth for bhangi, detention without trial, enforcing the white only" rule for drinking beer in nairobi, courts are dangerous and can b le extremely stupid e.t.c the ruling is stupid and tribal and removing idiots who use a court in a Democratic country to introduce Communism and warped theories that go against the political and social theory of "majority rule" is ok and they can take an heitus to write about and market their new theory instead of quoting a case from India they don, understand, India is not a real democracy but a hybrid caste system with voting.

Mmmmm...