Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Round 2 is time to finish off baba politically
Rank: Veteran Joined: 8/28/2015 Posts: 1,247
|
quicksand wrote:Much Know wrote:US supreme court Chief Justice John G Roberts ridicules Kenya's power hungry supreme court, says they made poor judgement in search of international publicity, cites it a travesty to voters rights.
Where did you get this? And please don't say from that message doing the rounds on whatsapp...a 5 year old can create such with microsoft paint.... Dissenting with SC is one thing but spreading misinformation hapana, wachia hapo ndugu. Punchline, a five year could have painted a better judgement for heavens sake.  ,Behold, a sower went forth to sow;....
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 1/20/2011 Posts: 1,822 Location: Nakuru
|
 Dumb money becomes dumb only when it listens to smart money
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/5/2010 Posts: 2,061 Location: Nairobi
|
Much Know wrote:quicksand wrote:Much Know wrote:US supreme court Chief Justice John G Roberts ridicules Kenya's power hungry supreme court, says they made poor judgement in search of international publicity, cites it a travesty to voters rights.
Where did you get this? And please don't say from that message doing the rounds on whatsapp...a 5 year old can create such with microsoft paint.... Dissenting with SC is one thing but spreading misinformation hapana, wachia hapo ndugu. My friend be patient please before you jump to conclusions, am using a phone now, there was even an article BBC, an opinion piece immediately after the ruling that castigated this ruling, all advanced democracies and well educated lawyers (even in Kenya the profs are complaining) know this ruling cannot stand, it's nothing new or creative, no ujinga tu, why do you think the US lawyers will support an idiot like maraga and mwilu with a judgement that follows some India case to a constitutional crisis, which sane person would do that? Fair enough. Would you kindly post the link to the BBC opinion piece? I have been reading the international press, yet to see one castigating the ruling.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,335 Location: Masada
|
NKT Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/6/2008 Posts: 3,588
|
The silver lining in this cloud is that wazuans, poor farmers, e.t.c will benefit globally, locally, wealthise, much more from this than the "ruling class", more than raira and the partisan judges, wakati wa kupasua umewadia, what a time!Ngoja uoene what can change in a matter of weeks. Vindu vichenjaga!... Ras Kienyeji Man
|
|
|
Rank: Chief Joined: 5/9/2007 Posts: 13,095
|
Njung'e wrote:If justice Ndung'u found that the affidavit and attached "evidence/documents" as presented by Dr. Adwasi were fake materials, does this not constitute a criminal offense? Yani I had great interest in this ruling. Was so looking forward to hear what is this that was so big that the judges saw. I gave them enough benefit of doubt. But they failed me in specifics. E.g. Njoki Ndung'u analysis was based on Petitioner's affidavit said X, I went and checked and I found Y. Maraga4 talked of irregularities that affected the result but were not specific with the evidence provided. In fact they said one of the reasons they nullified was because IEBC did not open servers so "there must have been they were hiding". There must have been...Not there was. If there was, they did not point it out. The lack of specifics in this ruling must have been well magnified by the "we found no officer liable". A specific would have been RO X announced results Y at polling station Z, instead of those results being transmitted to National Tallying Center as Y, they arrived there as B, and the National Returning Officer used such fake results to announce the winner. Njoki had a whole 75 page such analysis yet hers is dissenting, the ruling had no such specific analysis yet it was the key issue. I kept telling @Muchr that I am waiting to hear how those technological errors distorted the results. Nothing came out clearly. They said that Chebukati should have verified all the form 34As, how? Okay, let me go read that thing again.
|
|
|
Rank: Chief Joined: 5/9/2007 Posts: 13,095
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/21/2011 Posts: 2,032
|
Even a 2 year old knows the majority ruling doesn't add up. But am convinced that the majority has learnt their lesson and we need to move on as a country, indeed, on the flip side, nobody knows where we would be now if election result was upheld and aliar started his usual mass action - there is possibility we could be worse off. It is well, it is well, it is well.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma
|
washiku wrote:Njung'e wrote:If justice Ndung'u found that the affidavit and attached "evidence/documents" as presented by Dr. Adwasi were fake materials, does this not constitute a criminal offense? Yani I had great interest in this ruling. Was so looking forward to hear what is this that was so big that the judges saw. I gave them enough benefit of doubt. But they failed me in specifics. E.g. Njoki Ndung'u analysis was based on Petitioner's affidavit said X, I went and checked and I found Y. Maraga4 talked of irregularities that affected the result but were not specific with the evidence provided. In fact they said one of the reasons they nullified was because IEBC did not open servers so "there must have been they were hiding". There must have been...Not there was. If there was, they did not point it out. The lack of specifics in this ruling must have been well magnified by the "we found no officer liable". A specific would have been RO X announced results Y at polling station Z, instead of those results being transmitted to National Tallying Center as Y, they arrived there as B, and the National Returning Officer used such fake results to announce the winner. Njoki had a whole 75 page such analysis yet hers is dissenting, the ruling had no such specific analysis yet it was the key issue. I kept telling @Muchr that I am waiting to hear how those technological errors distorted the results. Nothing came out clearly. They said that Chebukati should have verified all the form 34As, how? Okay, let me go read that thing again. Read this long piece by Ahmednasir http://www.nation.co.ke/...105170-v6c1p6/index.html
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 7/27/2014 Posts: 560 Location: Eastlando
|
The best that Ahmednasir wrote, is that RAO´s supporters and some civil society members, have always tried to credit RAO with every democratic milestone in this country. They credit him with multi-party,forgetting that people like Matiba and Charles Rubia played a very pivotal role. With the 2010 constitituion, we have to thank Kivutha Kibwana and Mutula Kilonzo alot but no it is RAO who engineered everything according to his supporters
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Round 2 is time to finish off baba politically
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|