Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
NASA moves to the Supreme Court
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/21/2011 Posts: 2,032
|
Public interest is what will prevail on this matter. The jury will ask, if the election were to be repeated in perfect or near perfect conditions, would the outcome be different? To the degree they are confident with whatever they think is the answer, and what they think is the implication of either decision (to public interest) is what will inform
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/26/2007 Posts: 6,514
|
limanika wrote:Public interest is what will prevail on this matter. The jury will ask, if the election were to be repeated in perfect or near perfect conditions, would the outcome be different? To the degree they are confident with whatever they think is the answer, and what they think is the implication of either decision (to public interest) is what will inform I dont think a court of law is in the business of predicting or speculating...are they? Business opportunities are like buses,there's always another one coming
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 12/11/2006 Posts: 930
|
Did lack of iebc security features on some of the forms in any way disadvantage Raila/Nasa at the polls? (In short, if there is no watermark, how does that detrimentally affect Nasa to the advantage of say Jubilee? ) if iebc identify those forms as their authentic documents then Nasa can only claim that the figures contained therein are erroneous or fraudulent and prove it. Is there legislation that specify what kind of security features should be on those forms Is the court going to rule on what James Orengo invents in court as being mandatory security features or whether they will overlook what is defined under the constitution and existing law as the basic requirements for these forms where the format and requirements are provided. Is Raila on a mission to find issues that are good for him to score political points Why is NASA in this petition failing to use their own agents to make their case “Invest in yourself. Your career is the engine of your wealth.”
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/21/2011 Posts: 2,032
|
KulaRaha wrote:limanika wrote:Public interest is what will prevail on this matter. The jury will ask, if the election were to be repeated in perfect or near perfect conditions, would the outcome be different? To the degree they are confident with whatever they think is the answer, and what they think is the implication of either decision (to public interest) is what will inform I dont think a court of law is in the business of predicting or speculating...are they? Man was not made for the law. Rather, law was made by man, for the man. As such, it's no surprise if sometimes the word 'court of law' and 'predict' appear in same sentence
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
KulaRaha wrote:limanika wrote:Public interest is what will prevail on this matter. The jury will ask, if the election were to be repeated in perfect or near perfect conditions, would the outcome be different? To the degree they are confident with whatever they think is the answer, and what they think is the implication of either decision (to public interest) is what will inform I dont think a court of law is in the business of predicting or speculating...are they? Probabilities are speculations. But imagine having equipment and techniques for reducing error rates?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/6/2008 Posts: 3,587
|
We all know all these expenses are to massage and cool down Raila and his huge ego and wajinga (swahili for Illiterate) fans from the shock of his loss. This is why they keep repeating 11%. That margin of "loss of popularity" amongst wajingas because it means wa Kenya wameanza ku-erevuka na kusoma, na kujua mambo ya performance. For a 'populist' in his former breadbasket Kenyan poor where ujinga was very high, but fast abating is too much. It's the biggest election victory in Kenyan multi party history, with the strongest, fastest, most intelligent IEBC in Africa. Uhuru gained a whole 4 points over his performance and Raila lost three. Otherwise it was clear for any reasonable educated person listening to the case to see Raila amechapwa sawa sawa, it's all a fiasco facilitated by the levels of ignorance among Naswa and the general public about 'servers' and 'hackers' bullshit that can only be made up by con men and believed by wajingas! This kumbaff Raila was recorded harassing a watchmen at supreme court, a complete manner-less buffoon harassing simpletons, I remember Nancy Barasa ordeal and wonder where peoples sensibilities have suddenly disappeared to? Ras Kienyeji Man
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 12/1/2008 Posts: 1,098
|
ngapat wrote:Did lack of iebc security features on some of the forms in any way disadvantage Raila/Nasa at the polls? (In short, if there is no watermark, how does that detrimentally affect Nasa to the advantage of say Jubilee? )
if iebc identify those forms as their authentic documents then Nasa can only claim that the figures contained therein are erroneous or fraudulent and prove it.
Is there legislation that specify what kind of security features should be on those forms
Is the court going to rule on what James Orengo invents in court as being mandatory security features or whether they will overlook what is defined under the constitution and existing law as the basic requirements for these forms where the format and requirements are provided.
Is Raila on a mission to find issues that are good for him to score political points
Why is NASA in this petition failing to use their own agents to make their case
That is the part that vexes me a great deal  All that money collected for adopting this and that was not used. Was Raila serious with this thing? He promised so much but delivered nothing. Remember him saying he has a cloud server where his tally will be done so that, "wakihesabu, tunahesabu!" Raila is a con man!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/29/2011 Posts: 2,242
|
Jump-steady wrote:ngapat wrote:Did lack of iebc security features on some of the forms in any way disadvantage Raila/Nasa at the polls? (In short, if there is no watermark, how does that detrimentally affect Nasa to the advantage of say Jubilee? )
if iebc identify those forms as their authentic documents then Nasa can only claim that the figures contained therein are erroneous or fraudulent and prove it.
Is there legislation that specify what kind of security features should be on those forms
Is the court going to rule on what James Orengo invents in court as being mandatory security features or whether they will overlook what is defined under the constitution and existing law as the basic requirements for these forms where the format and requirements are provided.
Is Raila on a mission to find issues that are good for him to score political points
Why is NASA in this petition failing to use their own agents to make their case
That is the part that vexes me a great deal All that money collected for adopting this and that was not used. Was Raila serious with this thing? He promised so much but delivered nothing. Remember him saying he has a cloud server where his tally will be done so that, "wakihesabu, tunahesabu!" Raila is a con man! We need our very own @FRM, who was part of the adpot a thing team, enlighten us on what happened with the cash and why the agents did not go a good job Either way, Baba can never win on numbers ( his legal team acknowledged numbers are not important) and the way in is through nusu mkate "Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least." Goethe
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/28/2015 Posts: 9,562 Location: Rodi Kopany, Homa Bay
|
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 4/1/2009 Posts: 1,885
|
Jump-steady wrote:ngapat wrote:Did lack of iebc security features on some of the forms in any way disadvantage Raila/Nasa at the polls? (In short, if there is no watermark, how does that detrimentally affect Nasa to the advantage of say Jubilee? )
if iebc identify those forms as their authentic documents then Nasa can only claim that the figures contained therein are erroneous or fraudulent and prove it.
Is there legislation that specify what kind of security features should be on those forms
Is the court going to rule on what James Orengo invents in court as being mandatory security features or whether they will overlook what is defined under the constitution and existing law as the basic requirements for these forms where the format and requirements are provided.
Is Raila on a mission to find issues that are good for him to score political points
Why is NASA in this petition failing to use their own agents to make their case
That is the part that vexes me a great deal All that money collected for adopting this and that was not used. Was Raila serious with this thing? He promised so much but delivered nothing. Remember him saying he has a cloud server where his tally will be done so that, "wakihesabu, tunahesabu!" Raila is a con man! 
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
NASA moves to the Supreme Court
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|