Someone wake me up when the final ruling is made… the only thing I wonder is if the court rules we need to repeat the elections, will we do President only or full elections?

Taking a wild guess here...

Orengo and Co. aren't as clueless as the summations here and on SM look like.

To prove their case all needed are afew pointers for the judges;
- If forms (scanned) were sent after the results were transmitted. Indications by IEBC had been these are transmitted together.
- Are the sent/scanned forms same as the physical ones presented by IEBC to the petitioner and the court too?
- When did the results start coming in to the IEBC systems ?

Not much IT jargon is needed to be spewed for the judges. If there are various discrepancies between the scanned forms and the physical forms that will form a very strong basis for Orengo & Co.

If the petitioners deal with the issues of system integrity they will be dismissed at 5:05pm tomorrow.

I wonder if NASA compiled a list of what they want from IEBC ....
What on earth will they do with the firewall used to protect KIEMS? Or the operating system, or certified copies of penetration tests?
First, a firewall can be hardware based, software based or both. It would be hilarious to see a techie hand over a rack server to NASA's IT guy for analysis, or some PCIe cards ...or a zip file containing some .exe files, a disc with a copy of Linux.
Sound weird? Cause it is. These items are useless as sources of evidence. They do not contain any data. In the case of software, the files are compiled and executable,...illegible to humans,..the logic there-in can only be accessed by the most hardcore of IT engineers using advanced tools (decompilers/disassemblers)..would take weeks and any explanations would simply be miles over the heads of judges and the general public...assuming there was mischief anyway. I hope this is not NASAs strategy
Comedy!
Only the polling station list, the forms and user account audit trails hold some small hope for the NASA team.

It can open a can of worms,remember there are losers yet to file their petitions.So How the SCOK rules can give ground for their petition

For example if SCOK rules that the Ballot papers failed the required standard eg sucurity wise..The other petioners will use that

To view when the forms arrived and when the text arrived you do need the server logs for that. As well as the data that arrived.

If there are any modifications to any data the logs should be sufficient to indicate when modification was done. That should settle the matter as requested. Not holding brief for any of the parties.