Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
NASA moves to the Supreme Court
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/29/2011 Posts: 2,242
|
murchr wrote:Orengo is still talking of servers and transaction logs  claims the documents presented yesterday are a fraud So many squirrels on their path until they get distracted on what the real target is. Last time they said they want all the KIEMS kits presented in court as part of eveidence yawa. "Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least." Goethe
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
Kesho saa moja usiku the Star wrote:Supreme Court calls for a status conference on the presidential petition challenging the re-election of President Uhuru Kenyatta.
The Status Conference will be held at 7pm and all lawyers appearing have been asked to be robed.  "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 12/11/2006 Posts: 919
|
We will be in for some drama. It is clear now that the form 34A that NASA has are different with the IEBC ones. Where have they got them from? “Invest in yourself. Your career is the engine of your wealth.”
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
This Petition will be so interesting These lawyers dont give a Sh!t discussions on going. More tweets on just posting the ones popping my eyes "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/22/2009 Posts: 2,449 Location: Africa
|
murchr wrote:This Petition will be so interesting
These lawyers dont give a Sh!t discussions on going.
More tweets on just posting the ones popping my eyes
These guys were warned to stop discussing the merits and demerits of the case until it is determined
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/7/2012 Posts: 11,929
|
Does Court of Appeal decision bind the Supreme Court? In the business world, everyone is paid in two coins - cash and experience. Take the experience first; the cash will come later - H Geneen
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 10/29/2008 Posts: 1,566
|
Shak wrote:murchr wrote:This Petition will be so interesting
These lawyers dont give a Sh!t discussions on going.
More tweets on just posting the ones popping my eyes
These guys were warned to stop discussing the merits and demerits of the case until it is determined They are acutely aware that either way they are losing, since they have no case that can stand in a proper court. Their target therefore is the court that they can bamboozle – the court of public opinion. They couldn’t care less how much the Supreme Court judges get irritated, in fact the more the better, as this affords them a chance of reprimand – so that they can cry wolf and cite the court as hostile to them, thereby justifying ‘mass action’. Isuni yilu yi maa me muyo - ni Mbisuu
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
Best response "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 9/9/2010 Posts: 784 Location: ant hill - red hill
|
Angelica _ann wrote:Bigchick wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:Bigchick wrote:Gathige wrote:one more week to go and this is sorted out, and Baba is back to the street. The international Community should do a Riek Machar on him. The South Sudanese war lord was tricked into going to SA for treatment after a rescue from Congo Jungles and thereafter confined into a house with no contact with the rest of the world! Yep.I support that. Too many deaths since 1982 for him to ascend to power.Kenyans are tired and enlightened now. Mmmmm oooooooo one killed more people (including kiuks) and i dont see such bile towards him!!! We kicked him out 15 years ago and he moved to Kabarak quitely. He did not stick around to keep disturbing us every other day with nonsense of how theft and rigging and corruption vices of which he is a champion. Take a chill pill, enjoy life my dear sister pole pole ...... moved on with mzee to alternative investments & enjoying reggae  . Politics at the back banner How was reggae? The greatest act of bravery is chancing a fart while suffering from diarrhoea
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/22/2008 Posts: 2,718
|
NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
@Kusadikika - Petitions already filed "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 9/2/2010 Posts: 845
|
This case was dead and buried before it started. Incoherence galore. All my friends are heathens, take it slow. Wait for them to ask you who you know. Please don't make any sudden moves.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma
|
Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/22/2008 Posts: 2,718
|
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/10/2008 Posts: 9,131 Location: Kanjo
|
murchr wrote:Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop I have a feeling they created fake forms 34A and 34B which they presented as evidence. i.am.back!!!!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/29/2011 Posts: 2,242
|
harrydre wrote:murchr wrote:Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop I have a feeling they created fake forms 34A and 34B which they presented as evidence. Whoever claims the forms are fake will have the burden to produce the original to show the two are different. In this case the authoritative custodian of the original IEBC and whoever is holding a fake may be in possession of illegal materials, just like fake currency! "Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least." Goethe
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/3/2008 Posts: 4,057 Location: Gwitu
|
Gathige wrote:harrydre wrote:murchr wrote:Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop I have a feeling they created fake forms 34A and 34B which they presented as evidence. Whoever claims the forms are fake will have the burden to produce the original to show the two are different. In this case the authoritative custodian of the original IEBC and whoever is holding a fake may be in possession of illegal materials, just like fake currency! This will be tricky for NASA.There were three sets of 34As in each polling station . Take a situation where after filling the 1st one and transmitting it by KIEMS the PO realised a mistake and duly filled another one which was signed by agents and presented to RO. NASA would still be holding to the old one as 'evidence' Truth forever on the scaffold
Wrong forever on the throne
(James Russell Rowell)
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/29/2011 Posts: 2,242
|
All the the documents are now available online http://www.judiciary.go....tial-petition-1-of-2017
Such a simple matter but too much legal staff. Excel can resolve the case in less than 1 hour. "Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least." Goethe
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/3/2008 Posts: 4,057 Location: Gwitu
|
On Friday 1st, some will be jubilant after the ruling.Others will create some taharuki na watanyoroshwa kidogo. Nawaombea wapone haraka Truth forever on the scaffold
Wrong forever on the throne
(James Russell Rowell)
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
NASA moves to the Supreme Court
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|