Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
NASA moves to the Supreme Court
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
@Kusadikika - Petitions already filed "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 9/2/2010 Posts: 845
|
This case was dead and buried before it started. Incoherence galore. All my friends are heathens, take it slow. Wait for them to ask you who you know. Please don't make any sudden moves.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma
|
Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2012 Posts: 15,980
|
Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop "There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/22/2008 Posts: 2,723
|
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/10/2008 Posts: 9,131 Location: Kanjo
|
murchr wrote:Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop I have a feeling they created fake forms 34A and 34B which they presented as evidence. i.am.back!!!!
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/29/2011 Posts: 2,242
|
harrydre wrote:murchr wrote:Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop I have a feeling they created fake forms 34A and 34B which they presented as evidence. Whoever claims the forms are fake will have the burden to produce the original to show the two are different. In this case the authoritative custodian of the original IEBC and whoever is holding a fake may be in possession of illegal materials, just like fake currency! "Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least." Goethe
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/3/2008 Posts: 4,058 Location: Gwitu
|
Gathige wrote:harrydre wrote:murchr wrote:Lolest! wrote:Kusadikika wrote:NASA, please, please, please do not mention computers to the judges otherwise you are going nowhere.
This is the case you should be making:
The results on form 34C are incorrect.
This is because we have evidence of the 290 duly signed Form 34Bs and the total for Uhuru Kenyatta does not add up to 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Do not mention computers and algorithms and transmission.
This case rests on Forms and Forms only. 290 form 34Bs and 1 Form 34C.
Show the judges that totals on the 290 form 34Bs do not add up to what is written on form 34C.
Very simple, no need for any fancy computer jargon. Put the 290 numbers on an excel sheet and add them up. If the numbers do not add up then you have one third of a case.
To have 2 thirds of a case that number for Uhuru on form 34C needs to be more than the number of the totals on form 34Bs so that you can say he was given more than he got.
Now to get a full case you need to show that the real number of Uhuru votes as obtained from adding up all the form 34Bs is less that 50% + 1 of the votes cast.
Hiyo tu. Kazi rahisi sana. What about discrepancies between 34A and B? What about use of public resources? They need to prove that the discrepancies on the forms covers up the 1.4M or reduces UKs win to less than 50%+1 Use of public resources is just hogwash, President doesnt cease to be President because he's on election. So the cars and everything else that goes with power does not stop I have a feeling they created fake forms 34A and 34B which they presented as evidence. Whoever claims the forms are fake will have the burden to produce the original to show the two are different. In this case the authoritative custodian of the original IEBC and whoever is holding a fake may be in possession of illegal materials, just like fake currency! This will be tricky for NASA.There were three sets of 34As in each polling station . Take a situation where after filling the 1st one and transmitting it by KIEMS the PO realised a mistake and duly filled another one which was signed by agents and presented to RO. NASA would still be holding to the old one as 'evidence' Truth forever on the scaffold
Wrong forever on the throne
(James Russell Rowell)
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/29/2011 Posts: 2,242
|
All the the documents are now available online http://www.judiciary.go....tial-petition-1-of-2017
Such a simple matter but too much legal staff. Excel can resolve the case in less than 1 hour. "Things that matter most must never be at the mercy of things that matter least." Goethe
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/3/2008 Posts: 4,058 Location: Gwitu
|
On Friday 1st, some will be jubilant after the ruling.Others will create some taharuki na watanyoroshwa kidogo. Nawaombea wapone haraka Truth forever on the scaffold
Wrong forever on the throne
(James Russell Rowell)
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
NASA moves to the Supreme Court
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|