I hope there will be closure for you, although I really doubt it.

In fact the lack of closure in situations like this is good in that it pushes us always to search for 'better' - never mind that this destination 'better' is unlikely to ever be reached.

For me I prefer to view this mess from a perspective of 10,000 feet up, not eyeball to eyeball, being the only method I have found to break the lock of illusion that such dramas as this one tends to generate.

For instance:

(i) RAO's blinding ego is a major handicap for a leader, but the consequences of his likely humiliation again is that we stop deifying him. He's just human

(ii) Similarly the current deification of Uhuruto, especially by their supporters, the high expectations raised by reckless promises, will lead to bitter disappointment in Kenyans and very soon.

This is all good if it leads us to appreciate that our leaders are not miracle workers. We are responsible for the reality we create and while blaming someone else for our pain may feel good, it amounts to merely postponing the inevitable.

Also the 2013 Presidential petition created a precedence that will be quoted in this one. Which essentially raised the bar on the complainant so high that it is unlikely to be met.

Essentially to get the court to overturn the election, NASA not only have to prove that the process was flawed, but that such flaws could have affected the final result of the ENTIRE six elections, not just Presidential.

It will be easier to get 100 of their MP's to resign that to meet such a high threshold of proof, IMHO.

Summon some courage and say the truth!
Raila will not lose the case because of lack of attention to detail, but because he lost the election fairly and convincingly.

The challenge with Baba is getting the credible evidence he needs at the SC. If he provides statements and documents like what he provided at the first press conference with that IT guy, then the case becomes dead on arrival. Issues like algorithms, display of unsubstantiated results on the screen, illegal polling stations, un-gazetted returning officers all look credible but when put on test at the SC might crumble like the proverbial pie.

Great harvest time for lawyers though!

Taking ownership of the situation?