Kwani what results were used to declare the outcome? the "computerized" results or the Physical Form 34Bs?

The forms. But they've said we had bonoko/imposters among the CROs and presiding officers

2 votes here and there don't matter.it has to be on a large scale. The court has to weigh in on the overall credibility of the polls which all observers have termed as credible.

I hope it is the physical 34Bs because that is what the Appeals court ordered but remember that there was a point where Chiloba said as they were waiting for 2 forms that they were calling the Returning Officers for clarification. I am sure that it is possible that there might be a few errors for example that the total on the 34B is not the same as the total of the 34As. You do not have to prove that you won only that the results are not accurate and therefore not credible at which point you throw the decision to the court and we are all at the mercy of what they decide.

Extent is key.
A few errors in any human activity is normal.
The court is made of human beings who marry rationale with the law.

Harrydre do not joke with courts. Have you heard the saying the law is an ass. When a case is in court even when the evidence is strong you are at the mercy of the judges because they can opt to focus on even the most minute detail and pivot on that to declare something invalid.

Courts love their own rulings more than the truth. So for example if a constituency A had 10 polling stations and the total number of votes for Uhuru were 3423 from the totals on form 34 As and Raila had 2576 from the totals of 34 As. If when filling out the form 34B the constituency returning officer wrote and announced that Uhuru's votes were 4323 and Raila's were 2756 then IEBC can only use the latter figures even if they are incorrect. They cannot do their own addition and announce the correct number.

So in this situation there will always be a case regardless of what happens. If NASA discovers errors in any form 34B they will argue that the form is invalid and therefore should not have been used if IEBC announced the corrected number they can argue that they did not follow the law by announcing the figure on form 34B as required. Once a judge hears this then he has to make a ruling at which point it is out of anyones hands and the judges can rule as they wish.

What of the hacker? Must be missing something in your long explanation, because you have not mentioned IEBC servers anywhere ama it's sarcasm, people are so heavy on sarcasm, irony e.t.c mpaka tunakuwa confused, too many words without mysql and superuser is not enough! Beyond sarcasm e.t.c some add a little ka-upumbavu, kidogo tu to drive their point home.