Nandwa wrote:Mubebelezano uishe.
Let RAO be told the naked truth.
The people who are dying as a result of the ill advised chaotic protests are squarely due to him - RAO.
Why is it taboo to tell RAO the hard truth!
And what is this truth? That Raila lost 'fairly'? How much do we know about this?
Consider this other 'truth'. The courts are the best suited to determine the truth.
But what happens in instances where 'truth' threatens the status quo and the imminent change is deemed too costly, even by some of those who are to determine the truth?
I'd like to use the example of the ICC cases against the now president elect and his deputy. Considering the lobbying and jockeying that was evident, the ICC had to consider the threat to its existence and it's probable that this was an influence in how the court decided to deal with the cases.
The big question now is how we can negotiate truth in a pluralist society, and also how and whether this truth can be enforced or effected.
We lose it when we define the problem simply as, 'Raila'.