The law is very clear.
When you go register with your name and ID and fingerprints, that information is no longer private. Since it says that that information must be made public in an online portal...There is nothing that is more un-private than that.
So name and ID in the voter roll according to the constitution is not private data.
A name an ID by themselves do not constitute an invasion of privacy. Invasion of privacy is where someone releases your data without your permission.
You as a voter are assumed to have read and understood the law. And understood that your information shall be made public. That when you went to get that voters card, your name and ID and face and a fingerprint was going to be in a public database.
That is why even in countries like the US where private information is key. Or the EU where private information can get you in court, voter rolls are still public. So are birth rolls, school rolls, marriage rolls, death rolls, etc.
Voter information is not private data.
If that is the argument the IEBC wants to take to their next court case, I think they really need to get new lawyers from high school or something. That voter register doesn't belong to them. It belongs to the citizens. And they must give it when required by any citizen.
Kwanza they are very lucky I ain't suing. They would have had to keep that data in the public 24 hours a day, 365 days a year as it happens in other democracies. Hata Russia jameni.
Thieves are not good people. Tumeelewana?