wazua Thu, Apr 2, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

14 Pages«<56789>»
SYRIA The End Game
harrydre
#61 Posted : Friday, April 07, 2017 6:16:26 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/10/2008
Posts: 9,131
Location: Kanjo
so who is the fool now? Love Obama's silence. He should retweet that tweet today.

http://www.bluedotdaily....m_campaign=facebook_BD.




Quote:
What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict? Obama needs Congressional approval.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013
If Obama attacks Syria and innocent civilians are hurt and killed, he and the U.S. will look very bad!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 30, 2013
What I am saying is stay out of Syria.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 4, 2013
AGAIN, TO OUR VERY FOOLISH LEADER, DO NOT ATTACK SYRIA - IF YOU DO MANY VERY BAD THINGS WILL HAPPEN & FROM THAT FIGHT THE U.S. GETS NOTHING!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2013
President Obama, do not attack Syria. There is no upside and tremendous downside. Save your "powder" for another (and more important) day!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 7, 2013
i.am.back!!!!
Obi 1 Kanobi
#62 Posted : Friday, April 07, 2017 6:54:20 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/23/2008
Posts: 3,017
AlphDoti wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Assad should have cut a deal with the US while Obama is still around. The next president will not be as sympathetic or empathetic, and regardless of what they think, Russia and US are not equals, somehow the US will bend Russia to its will through pressure or bribery, then Assad will be left on his own to fend off a rabid insurgency backed by CIA Black Ops, who will then turn on each other and then on the US and Syria like every other Middle Eastern Country will remain as shit as ever.

All this calculated to ensure the survival of Israel and a low price for oil.

Pµt1n already warn them not to mess with ñµcléär Rµss1ä, he is not going to bend... If they insist in pushing the nonsense, WWÏÏÏ is imminent...


Don't mean to chest thump but I called it perfectly.
"The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline." James Collins
2012
#63 Posted : Friday, April 07, 2017 7:13:18 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/9/2009
Posts: 6,592
Location: Nairobi
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
AlphDoti wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Assad should have cut a deal with the US while Obama is still around. The next president will not be as sympathetic or empathetic, and regardless of what they think, Russia and US are not equals, somehow the US will bend Russia to its will through pressure or bribery, then Assad will be left on his own to fend off a rabid insurgency backed by CIA Black Ops, who will then turn on each other and then on the US and Syria like every other Middle Eastern Country will remain as shit as ever.

All this calculated to ensure the survival of Israel and a low price for oil.

Pµt1n already warn them not to mess with ñµcléär Rµss1ä, he is not going to bend... If they insist in pushing the nonsense, WWÏÏÏ is imminent...


Don't mean to chest thump but I called it perfectly.


Don't you mean 'chest Trump'?

BBI will solve it
:)
Nandwa
#64 Posted : Friday, April 07, 2017 7:27:43 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 11/17/2009
Posts: 1,049
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
AlphDoti wrote:
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
Assad should have cut a deal with the US while Obama is still around. The next president will not be as sympathetic or empathetic, and regardless of what they think, Russia and US are not equals, somehow the US will bend Russia to its will through pressure or bribery, then Assad will be left on his own to fend off a rabid insurgency backed by CIA Black Ops, who will then turn on each other and then on the US and Syria like every other Middle Eastern Country will remain as shit as ever.

All this calculated to ensure the survival of Israel and a low price for oil.

Pµt1n already warn them not to mess with ñµcléär Rµss1ä, he is not going to bend... If they insist in pushing the nonsense, WWÏÏÏ is imminent...


Don't mean to chest thump but I called it perfectly.

AlphDoti wrote:
2012 wrote:
Shak wrote:
Trump orders a military strike against Syria...

'US warships launched 59 Tomahawk cruise missiles at a Syrian government airbase where the warplanes that carried out the chemical attacks were based'.

Finally, Trump takes on Russia.

'Russia will demand an urgent UN Security Council meeting after the US airstrike on Syrian aviation base. "This is an act of aggression against a UN member."

As long as Russia is not provoked directly, they'll not give a hoot. Russia will concentrate on areas with the US shoe-polish boys are operating around.

Just as absolute power corrupts leaders, so does absolute fanaticism blind the people from logic
Rahatupu
#65 Posted : Saturday, April 08, 2017 5:59:47 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 12/4/2009
Posts: 1,982
Location: matano manne
In the words of Ron Paul:
“The peace talks have ended now. They’re terrified that peace was going to break out! Al-Qaeda was on the run, peace talks were happening, and all of a sudden, they had to change, and this changes things dramatically! I don’t expect peace talks anytime soon or in the distant future.”
Anbu
#66 Posted : Monday, April 10, 2017 12:08:43 AM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 11/11/2015
Posts: 21
Location: Nakuru
Apparently Trump holds shares of Raytheon, the company that makes Tomahawks
The struggle continues
2012
#67 Posted : Monday, April 10, 2017 9:04:27 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/9/2009
Posts: 6,592
Location: Nairobi
Anbu wrote:
Apparently Trump holds shares of Raytheon, the company that makes Tomahawks


It's interesting how civilians in the States have shares in military hardware. These people are more powerful than the Generals in the military and they call the shots because the government is run by civilians.
Imagine if CMC was in charge of building our military vehicles, we would never leave Somali and Juba.

BBI will solve it
:)
Gakware
#68 Posted : Monday, April 10, 2017 2:34:54 PM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 2/9/2017
Posts: 65
2012 wrote:
Anbu wrote:
Apparently Trump holds shares of Raytheon, the company that makes Tomahawks


It's interesting how civilians in the States have shares in military hardware. These people are more powerful than the Generals in the military and they call the shots because the government is run by civilians.
Imagine if CMC was in charge of building our military vehicles, we would never leave Somali and Juba.




There were some people claiming on twitter that the gas attack was staged. Ati it was an attempt to sabotage the whole peace process. d'oh! d'oh!
The past is the past, you either run from it or learn from it!
Obi 1 Kanobi
#69 Posted : Monday, April 10, 2017 2:39:04 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/23/2008
Posts: 3,017
2012 wrote:
Anbu wrote:
Apparently Trump holds shares of Raytheon, the company that makes Tomahawks


It's interesting how civilians in the States have shares in military hardware. These people are more powerful than the Generals in the military and they call the shots because the government is run by civilians.
Imagine if CMC was in charge of building our military vehicles, we would never leave Somali and Juba.


Why would civilians not have shares in private companies contracted to develop military hardware. Most of this military equipment manufacturers are actually listed entities and anyone can buy shares, example Boeing and Airbus.
"The purpose of bureaucracy is to compensate for incompetence and lack of discipline." James Collins
2012
#70 Posted : Monday, April 10, 2017 2:45:31 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 12/9/2009
Posts: 6,592
Location: Nairobi
Obi 1 Kanobi wrote:
2012 wrote:
Anbu wrote:
Apparently Trump holds shares of Raytheon, the company that makes Tomahawks


It's interesting how civilians in the States have shares in military hardware. These people are more powerful than the Generals in the military and they call the shots because the government is run by civilians.
Imagine if CMC was in charge of building our military vehicles, we would never leave Somali and Juba.


Why would civilians not have shares in private companies contracted to develop military hardware. Most of this military equipment manufacturers are actually listed entities and anyone can buy shares, example Boeing.


I don't think such companies should be directly involved in politics. It's a serious and dangerous conflict of interest. These companies will want to test their products in real warfare and the easiest way is to get the president to create a war somewhere. Such companies should be under the control of the government in order to get contracts or to be allowed to operate otherwise they'd be terrorists developing illegal weapons.

But the US is interesting, they never learn, I remember the rivalry between gun manufacturers Smith & Wesson and Colt, Colt supplied guns to the South army yet he was a northerner during the American north and south war, the Colt gun killed the largest number of the northern army where Samuel Colt was a soldier.

BBI will solve it
:)
14 Pages«<56789>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.