Bigchick wrote:Swenani wrote:Bigchick wrote:kaka2za wrote:thuks wrote:kaka2za wrote:Tired with Jubilee and not excited by NASA disgruntled voters might vote for fringe candidates and the protest Vote could deny either of the big two the 50%+1
And then what?
The dreaded 2nd round will happen
And a winner will emerge and life goes on.Whoever will be ahead except for 50%+1 will still emerge the winner as his supporters will still be there and maybe gain a little more from the losers since people like being associated with the winners.
Who really dreads round 2?Its just that its an unnecessay extension of the political madness as well as the cost implication.
This assumption is very pedestrian Bigshick, have you factored in the voter turn out in round 1 and 2 both which can change the outcome of round 2?
Please explain the voter turnout effect.
I agree my being very pedestrian in the thoughts.
Let me drop some numbers here. These are the voter turnouts in Kenya since 1992.
1992(69%), 1997(65%), 2002(57%), 2007(69%), 2013 (85.9%).
Which counties caused this unusual turnout in 2013?
Siaya (92%), Kisumu (90%), homabay (94%), kiambu (91%), Nyeri (93%), nyadarua (94%), Kirinyaga (91%).
For perspective, Belgium where voting is mandatory by law averages 95% turnout.
Question is can these counties sustain the same abnormal turnouts ?
Why did people turnout in these unusually high numbers ?
Are we likely to see a return to the normal range of 65%-80% ?