masukuma wrote:Alba wrote:masukuma wrote:Ah! The man with all the answers the one and only Professor Alba lecturing us again. What would we do without him!
Glad to see masukuma with his twisted, warped logic gracing this thread.
Go on tell us again how an
immoral and
corrupt action is OK so long as it is
legal.
I always wonder what your metric is to define acts noted in
blue if not what is defined in the
law? ama we dream up these things or they come to us in revelation or we get lectured on what is wrong or right by le professeur alba?
anyway I digress... continue lecturing us on what we need to do to move to the next level.
Start using google. The internet is your friend. It will help alleviate your ignorance.
A basic google search will give you the definition of immoral:
not conforming to accepted standards of morality, wrongful, bad, unethical.As such :
1. Waiguru buying bic pens for Ksh 8000 may be legal but it is wrong and unethical.
2. A political bigwig grabbing primary school land may be legal but it is wrong and unethical.
3. Cutting a back door deal to get paid Ksh 35 million of tax payer money is immoral and corrupt
They do not conform to accepted standards therefore they are unethical. The accepted standard is to pay a person what they are capable of earning in the open market.
They are corrupt because they did not follow standard procedures. There was no oversight. Sarah Serem said in May that she is not aware of the Ksh 35m. This means the treasury bypassed the oversight committee. Heck even Nyachae said he was unaware. And he also said that such deals are hidden from the public. Bypassing the oversight committee and hiding from the taxpaying public is classic corruption.
The fact that I have to explain why this is immoral and corrupt is quite frankly shocking.