@nandwa, I like your question. But the man, prophet Isa (Jesus Christ) had no genealogy, he had no father. Unless you want the genealogy of his mother, Mary.

Unfortunately, the writers of Bible have manufactured a gealogy for him, and a very interesting one indeed! Six adulterers and offsprings of incest are attributed to him.

Yet their own Bible condemns children born out of wedlock:
“The bastard shall not enter the congregation of the Lord even unto the tenth generation.” (Deuteronomy 23:2).

Today, we look at the good book of Exodus. Very holy. Enjoy reading.

EXODUS 2:12 Moses saw an Egyptian beating up a Hebrew. He looked around, saw no witnesses, killed the Egyptian and hid him in the sand.

EXODUS 7:2-4 God hardened Pharaoh’s heart and planned his "mighty acts of judgment.

EXODUS 7:20-21 God turned the Nile river to blood. The fish died, and the water was undrinkable.

EXODUS 8: 6-7 God sent a plague of frogs which covered the land.

EXODUS 8:16 God sent a plague of gnats.

EXODUS 8:24 God sent a swarm of flies.

EXODUS 9:5 God killed all of the Egyptian livestock with a plague.

EXODUS 9:10 God sent a plague of festering boils on the people and animals.

EXODUS 9:22-25 God sent a hail storm to Egypt, striking man and animal, stripping the land.

EXODUS 12: 29 God killed the first-born in every Egyptian home that wasn’t marked with lamb’s blood.

EXODUS 17:13 Moses held out the staff of God, allowing Joshua to kill the Amalekites.

EXODUS 21:20-21 According to God’s law, it was wrong to beat a slave to the point of death. But if the slave survived and got back up within a few days, the beating wasn’t punishable, because the slave was the property of the master. (God endorsed slavery and the beating of slaves.)

EXODUS 32:27 After seeing the golden calf, God commanded the Levites, "Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and neighbor." 3,000 were slaughtered, and God was pleased.

So? Didn't Muhammad lust over his daughter in law later marrying her?

tofauti kabisa!

The so called "holy books " are just sensational novels written literally to excite target readers in the Middle East then. Similar to John Kiriamiti - my life in crime being a holy book 2000yrs to come.

The answer to Deuteronomy 23:2 is in Hebrews 12:8.The definition of illegitimacy and all...

There's virtually no difference between desert gods regardless of name. What one finds however is that the material environment seem to influence the gods imagine by people. Amongst the eskimo, notions of hell involved ideas of a very cold place, since heat was highly desired hence being condemned to a hot hell would not be viewed negatively. Likewise the desert religions conceive punishment in terms of a hot location rather than a cold one.

When one looks at budhist notions of religion one finds a religion seeking repose and relaxation since asian culteres were basically well fed. For Confucianism as evolved in china, one finds that it was a religion founded on beurocratic principles which included not surprisingly meritocracy and earthly equity.
My point is this, all these arguments between followers of the two desert religions and against both of them neither proves atheism or which one between islam and christianity is better, since both are literally two sides of the same coin.

Atheism remains a false idea that never stands to any kind of sustained scrutiny. Atheism brother is Secular Humanism which simply replaces an unseen god for the human, specifically, the male human. ie self worship. This almost always leads to occult worship which goes back to demon worship. In other words an atheist is an agnostic closet devil worshipper by default.

Perhaps the best way to compare religions is to judge them by their claims. What makes christianity stand apart is the idea of foretelling or prophecy especially detailed eschatology.

Eschatology ni mambo za end days

Your post was going very well until the highlighted above. That paragraph contains all fallacies in can imagine. It's almost like it was written by someone else.

Atheism is indeed secular humanism, and may in fact express itself in male terms in many cases. Occultism is of course a different thing altogether, and devil worship may be a moot point especially when 'devil' is also assumed to be universal.

We're always cognitively limited by our mind programs and algorithms so don't worry when others say what we believe is preposterous. It's a good thing actually. It's space for development.

Problems arise when we think that we want to conclude issues rather than explore.