wazua Fri, May 8, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

3 Pages<123>
Bishop EACC Chair Nominee Mwathani !
aemathenge
#11 Posted : Thursday, December 22, 2016 6:14:02 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/18/2008
Posts: 3,434
Location: Kerugoya
PeterReborn wrote:
Why do we complain about but leaders and then when we get good ones then we also complain that they will be tainted.What exactly do we want?

When the UhuRuto duo decided to clean up the Education Sector, they did not choose a Good Man. They unleashed The Best Man for the job.

He has yet to disappoint them and citizens of this Our Land Nation. His real test as The Best Man however, will come during the second term of next year.

This is when form twos will start igniting dormitories.

When the UhuRuto duo decided to clean up the mess at The Pride of Africa, they did not influence the appointment of a Good Man to chair the Board. They unleashed The Best Man for the job.

This is irrespective of that “mkoroni mamboleo” hogwash we heard during the hustler Airways and “the place that does not belong to our mothers” sagas. His real test results will come out with every quarterly report as demanded by the Nairoberry Securities Exchange.

When the UhuRuto duo decided to clean up the Central Bank of Kenya, they did not nominate a Good Man, such as the vastly experienced current Presidential Economic Adviser. They unleashed The Best Man for the job.

Three banks and their shady principal shareholders are reaping the whirlwind of The Best Man’s best foot forward.

The “system” is however presenting speed bumps.

The UhuRuto Duo signed the hogwash Interest Rate Cap Bill to the chagrin of The Best Man and despite one of them holding a degree in Economics from a prestigious US Alma Mater.

Remember the Good Man, the Cook, who said without butting an eyelid that the terrorists had burnt mattresses?

The Duo plucked The Retired General from “wale jamaa wa upande ile ingine” and unleased him against the terrorists within our borders.

Remember the si e ge and tinded windows Good Man?

The Duo unleashed a spook from behind the shadows because analysts identified intelligence information dissemination as the weak link against domestic terror attacks.

A Good Man will not slay the Ogre-Demon we call corruption. The Duo will have to unleash The Best Man.

You and I know who he is.

The Ogre-Demon detests and fears him with a passion. Wanjiku, Shiku, and Mama Shiku know how awesome he is.

The Bishop is not The Best Man. He is a Good Man.
Impunity
#12 Posted : Thursday, December 22, 2016 6:57:33 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/2/2009
Posts: 26,333
Location: Masada
D.O.A = Dead On Arrival.
Portfolio: Sold
You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.

aemathenge
#13 Posted : Thursday, December 29, 2016 5:56:40 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/18/2008
Posts: 3,434
Location: Kerugoya
Good evening, Bishop. How are things?

Now that you have chosen to ignore my plea, how about I throw a few punches to test your reflexes?

I will start easy. Ready, here goes……..

“It is a matter of regret that this Church’s delegation to the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) in Lusaka has been encouraged to disregard my spiritual counsel and attend this meeting.

In January, the Primates meeting at Canterbury agreed to curtail the participation of the Episcopal Church of the United States (TEC) in Communion bodies for a period of three years in view of its formal adoption of same sex ‘marriage’.”


Remember those words Bishop? You should.

They are extracts from your “Statement on Anglican Consultative Council 16, Lusaka” on which you appended your signature on 06 April, The Year of Our Lord, 2016.

Link 1:

Link 2:

Let me get this right, Bishop.

Your subordinates are willing to disregard, nay, defy, your “counsel” on such an emotive matter as same sex marriages and homosexuality.

How then do you expect us to trust you to control your presumptive subordinates at the EACC in particular and the other government bureaucrats in general if you could not control your own Church subordinates?

Let me re-phrase.

Someone has corrupted your subordinates in your church but you can only write some letters.

Do you think you will fight corruption in Kenia with some fancy letter writing?

Pray do tell.
aemathenge
#14 Posted : Tuesday, January 17, 2017 8:23:54 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/18/2008
Posts: 3,434
Location: Kerugoya
Wee wabukala

Like s e r i o u s l y ?
tycho
#15 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:00:03 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
I've got to give it up to the powerful masterminds for the selections they made for EACC and IEBC heads.

For me, it's obvious that it's not so much about efficiency in service, but it's about having the right people in the right places to ensure corruption and power stays put where it's presumed to belong.

Why am I saying this? The two nominees are individuals with no track record for generating systemic changes in their past, so even now, it would be naive for them to institute any significant changes to how the government, electoral, and corruption systems work.

The co-incidence of NASWA and both JAP and CORD warming up to the two seems to be merely an extension of looking for votes- for which the most likely loser is CORD.

Normally, the powerful would not undermine their own power through their appointments.

The bishop getting the anti-corruption job is also a way of fooling the religious masses to whom a bishop signifies a holy man who is presumed to be incorruptible. But of course this is naivete!
PeterReborn
#16 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:16:46 AM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 1/3/2014
Posts: 1,063
tycho wrote:
I've got to give it up to the powerful masterminds for the selections they made for EACC and IEBC heads.

For me, it's obvious that it's not so much about efficiency in service, but it's about having the right people in the right places to ensure corruption and power stays put where it's presumed to belong.

Why am I saying this? The two nominees are individuals with no track record for generating systemic changes in their past, so even now, it would be naive for them to institute any significant changes to how the government, electoral, and corruption systems work.

The co-incidence of NASWA and both JAP and CORD warming up to the two seems to be merely an extension of looking for votes- for which the most likely loser is CORD.

Normally, the powerful would not undermine their own power through their appointments.

The bishop getting the anti-corruption job is also a way of fooling the religious masses to whom a bishop signifies a holy man who is presumed to be incorruptible. But of course this is naivete!

Agreed.He will not bring any change and the status quo will remain.But it is better than having a tenderprenuer as the chair.
Consistency is better than intensity
aemathenge
#17 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 3:50:10 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/18/2008
Posts: 3,434
Location: Kerugoya
tycho wrote:
I've got to give it up to the powerful masterminds for the selections they made for EACC and IEBC heads.

For me, it's obvious that it's not so much about efficiency in service, but it's about having the right people in the right places to ensure corruption and power stays put where it's presumed to belong.

Why am I saying this? The two nominees are individuals with no track record for generating systemic changes in their past, so even now, it would be naive for them to institute any significant changes to how the government, electoral, and corruption systems work.

The co-incidence of NASWA and both JAP and CORD warming up to the two seems to be merely an extension of looking for votes- for which the most likely loser is CORD.

Normally, the powerful would not undermine their own power through their appointments.

The bishop getting the anti-corruption job is also a way of fooling the religious masses to whom a bishop signifies a holy man who is presumed to be incorruptible. But of course this is naivete!

Hear, hear.

By the way, this is @Tycho Number Four.

I like him more than the other three I have identified so far.
PeterReborn
#18 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 4:54:56 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 1/3/2014
Posts: 1,063
aemathenge wrote:
tycho wrote:
I've got to give it up to the powerful masterminds for the selections they made for EACC and IEBC heads.

For me, it's obvious that it's not so much about efficiency in service, but it's about having the right people in the right places to ensure corruption and power stays put where it's presumed to belong.

Why am I saying this? The two nominees are individuals with no track record for generating systemic changes in their past, so even now, it would be naive for them to institute any significant changes to how the government, electoral, and corruption systems work.

The co-incidence of NASWA and both JAP and CORD warming up to the two seems to be merely an extension of looking for votes- for which the most likely loser is CORD.

Normally, the powerful would not undermine their own power through their appointments.

The bishop getting the anti-corruption job is also a way of fooling the religious masses to whom a bishop signifies a holy man who is presumed to be incorruptible. But of course this is naivete!

Hear, hear.

By the way, this is @Tycho Number Four.

I like him more than the other three I have identified so far.

Is this the sane one?
Consistency is better than intensity
aemathenge
#19 Posted : Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:14:27 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 10/18/2008
Posts: 3,434
Location: Kerugoya
PeterReborn wrote:
aemathenge wrote:
tycho wrote:
I've got to give it up to the powerful masterminds for the selections they made for EACC and IEBC heads.

For me, it's obvious that it's not so much about efficiency in service, but it's about having the right people in the right places to ensure corruption and power stays put where it's presumed to belong.

Why am I saying this? The two nominees are individuals with no track record for generating systemic changes in their past, so even now, it would be naive for them to institute any significant changes to how the government, electoral, and corruption systems work.

The co-incidence of NASWA and both JAP and CORD warming up to the two seems to be merely an extension of looking for votes- for which the most likely loser is CORD.

Normally, the powerful would not undermine their own power through their appointments.

The bishop getting the anti-corruption job is also a way of fooling the religious masses to whom a bishop signifies a holy man who is presumed to be incorruptible. But of course this is naivete!

Hear, hear.

By the way, this is @Tycho Number Four.

I like him more than the other three I have identified so far.

Is this the sane one?

The smartly eloquent and lucid Gentleman I would invite for a Round of Golf and a Spot of Dinner at Windsor Golf and Country Club.

At my expense.
Cornelius Vanderbilt
#20 Posted : Thursday, January 19, 2017 2:21:58 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 8/15/2015
Posts: 817
fpr once an eacc head who is incorruptible!
3 Pages<123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.