Just be frank men, you know the roots and key divide in our tribal politics today. Even with the "cold war" claim, all resources from "cold war" were invested in Luo Nyanza and nowhere else, the fostering of a tribal demi-godracy is a long and tedious effort, why did Jaramogi reject Matibas leadership of FORD? And why did this "united ford" as a result break into several tribal "ford" groupings? Even Moi used to speak of vyama vya ukabila in regards to the 'opposition' that was being fronted by Jaramogi, this was before 2004, the intent was clear back then. Keep my tribesman captive with "harsh and bitter" tribal feelings, the concept and benefits of tribal lordship are not new, tribal bulkanisation and herding was a trend created early at independence for "power" and is not just a kikuyu disease a joho tries to imply. Be honest with yourself. There is a good sample of the thinking these tribal goons in wazua. Let's not compete in unnecessary niceties to tribal values.

I know the book, and the history, please forget this LIE that it is Jaramogi who insisted on Jomo Kenyatta, uwongo tupu! Why insist of someone and start fighting him immediately using another set of wazungus? British did NOT WANT Kenyatta, they wanted Jaramogi, it is THE PEOPLE who insisted not Jaramogi, perish that LIE. You cannot turn on someone you believe in, Odinga thought he was "cleverer" aka "more intelligent" than Kenyatta. Same way europeans planted "thick" set to fail Presidents all over Africa before they left. Read all history not just Odinga book, some independence leaders they planted like nkurumah, lumumba e.t.c they knew were really rumbling idiots, and the public still think this people were clever and heroes.

Luo Nyanza had a very good rapport with British and their land was not taken. They participated in burma, were many in kings african rifles e.t.c. They had labelled Kenyatta a "terrorist", a big lie which they have never recanted. Mzee Kenyatta had faced off with the British globally even to the point where the USA refused to join WWII unless the British made commitments to free Africa. By 1950 there around, most of Africa would have been turned to a white Australia-like place through massacres, the British did not consider Africans people, and the theory of evolution gave them imputus to slay "other species". This practice is what the like of Richard Dawkins family were taking part in Kenya and Malawi, burning "primitive crops" and planting their "scientific ones" his fellow "atheist" supporter James Watson of DNA fame voiced the same concerns about Africans just recently, we Africans are poorly evolved stupid human/animals that should make space for white people! They 'hated' to the CORE Mr. Kenyatta as a "thinking African" monkey of spoiler and Jaramogi seemed a 'good' alternative, and just as an "alternative", they loved Jaramogi and asked him to be President, publicly.

Whether that the settlers went to the highland areas and avoided malaria areas needs to be explained i don't know, the resulting "freedom" for such communities may not be by choice, but i think to a "more intelligent" european administrator than us, this would leave them as "fair game" when it comes to the "take-over", as some needed to be forcefully moved out of their land and into "reserves", what would tycho do on a very limited financial budget? Who would you hire? How would yo divide and rule CHEAPLY? i hope you understand what am saying, these is however a bad "use and dump" colonial history, and some bad leaders still clutch unto the backward groupings the mkoloni created, today, including violence, believing they stand to benefit from "tribal survival strategies" in a free democracy, hence useless ukabila..see the stupid ukabila threads in wazua, and ask yourself why those stupid 'wazua rapist' think a tribal thread is a "good" thing and "funny"? Why?

Those figures are highly doubtful, in any case i have never checked to see whether he cleared his loans for the land, ama bado wanatukanwa na wazungu juu ya madeni, do you have any debts yourself?, i really don't like gossip about peoples financial matters, and courts are there to settle land issues, and we have toooo much land, ask the Japanese, that's not our problem, more like wivu and ujinga is our problem, the hugest beneficiaries of land were maasais and the biggest land holder in Kenya is one and not Kenyattas, unless they are actually maasai, which cold be the case. Go to tanzania and see how much land they have.