Wazua
»
Investor
»
Economy
»
Law Capping interest rates
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/23/2009 Posts: 13,503 Location: nairobi
|
Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas HF 30,000 ABP 3.49; KQ 414,100 ABP 7.92; MTN 23,800 ABP 6.45
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/23/2009 Posts: 8,083 Location: Enk are Nyirobi
|
14% is still too high. I know people with mortgages at 3%, yes in Kenya and yes from the same same banks. Life is short. Live passionately.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 8/10/2014 Posts: 969 Location: Kenya
|
obiero wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas Hahaha thats what will be done
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/15/2013 Posts: 1,977 Location: Here
|
watesh wrote:obiero wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas Hahaha thats what will be done Very soreeee @Obiero Everybody STEALS, a THIEF is one who's CAUGHT stealing something of LITTLE VALUE. !!!
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
Boris Boyka wrote:watesh wrote:obiero wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas Hahaha thats what will be done Very soreeee @Obiero What are the advantages of flat rates vis a vis reducing balance for a bank/lender? Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 11/5/2010 Posts: 2,459
|
Impunity wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:watesh wrote:obiero wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas Hahaha thats what will be done Very soreeee @Obiero What are the advantages of flat rates vis a vis reducing balance for a bank/lender? This was discovered by CBK 3 years ago hence introduction of APR. 14.5% flat rate is equivalent to 26% reducing balance. You can't fool anyone with it.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 2/26/2015 Posts: 1,147
|
AND THEN ADD THIS GRAVY Chair Janet L. Yellen SPEECH It's not over until I winskype id: karasinga. email: kkarasinga@gmail.com
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 8/16/2009 Posts: 994
|
.. Time is money, so money is time. Money saved is time gained in reverse! Money stores your life’s energy. You expend your energy, get paid money, and store that money for a future purchase made in a currency.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
FRM2011 wrote:Impunity wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:watesh wrote:obiero wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas Hahaha thats what will be done Very soreeee @Obiero What are the advantages of flat rates vis a vis reducing balance for a bank/lender? This was discovered by CBK 3 years ago hence introduction of APR. 14.5% flat rate is equivalent to 26% reducing balance. You can't fool anyone with it. So if the bankers decide to charge loans at 14.5% flat rate then this new law is minced meat? aka dead on arrival!!!! Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 8/16/2009 Posts: 994
|
If what I hear is right "the new law only applies to new loans going by today's statement by co-op" why is all this holla ballo about. Impact on banks interest income will take a while to go lower. First because banks will not refinance existing loans because that will be like shotting their @$$ez. And now back to the MPs who passed the law hoping to coushion themselves after 2017 when we kick them out, how will they benefit? Were they damn to realize this loophole. Now I get it, someone advised this to "Kamwana" no wonder he signed it. Back to my original question, why all the panick in sellers to bank stocks-are they damn ama naona vitu hakuna? If we give existing loans an average life of 3 years, by the time they are done with us, a new ammendment bill will have been crafted. @MB you are fine. Nothing will hurt your investments as long as existing loans are not affected. @Obiero, your mortgage remains as expensive as ever. @VVS you will keep paying top dollar on your loan even after 25th Sep. Time is money, so money is time. Money saved is time gained in reverse! Money stores your life’s energy. You expend your energy, get paid money, and store that money for a future purchase made in a currency.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
Gatheuzi wrote:If what I hear is right "new law only applies to new loans going by today's statement by co-op" why is all this holla ballo about. Impact on banks interest income will take a while to go lower. First because banks will not refinance existing loans because that will be like shotting their @$$ez.
And now back to the MPs who passed the law hoping to coushion themselves after 2017 when we kick them out, how will they benefit. Were they damn to realize this loophole. Now I get it, someone advised this to "Kamwana" no wonder he signed it.
Back to my original question, why all the panick in sellers? @MB you are fine. Nothing will hurt your investments as long as existing loans are not affected. @Obiero, your mortgage remains as expensive as ever. @VVS you will keep paying top dollar on your loan even after 25th Sep. What if I take new loan from another bank at 14% and pay off the old loan taken at 21%? Early termination fee is usually small. Ama nafikiria vitu zangu? Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 2/20/2007 Posts: 767
|
Impunity wrote:FRM2011 wrote:Impunity wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:watesh wrote:obiero wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas Hahaha thats what will be done Very soreeee @Obiero What are the advantages of flat rates vis a vis reducing balance for a bank/lender? This was discovered by CBK 3 years ago hence introduction of APR. 14.5% flat rate is equivalent to 26% reducing balance. You can't fool anyone with it. So if the bankers decide to charge loans at 14.5% flat rate then this new law is minced meat? aka dead on arrival!!!! Wacha wajaribu. The issue will go to court and the courts will examine the spirit of the law when arriving at a decision. So, what do you think was the spirit of the law when enacted! They must find it difficult....... those who have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority. -G. Massey.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
tom_boy wrote:Impunity wrote:FRM2011 wrote:Impunity wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:watesh wrote:obiero wrote:Boris Boyka wrote:Something am thinking about, could banks lower interests but adopt fixed instead of reducing balance? I understand 14% flat rate is expensive than 18% reducing balance. Stop giving out such devious ideas Hahaha thats what will be done Very soreeee @Obiero What are the advantages of flat rates vis a vis reducing balance for a bank/lender? This was discovered by CBK 3 years ago hence introduction of APR. 14.5% flat rate is equivalent to 26% reducing balance. You can't fool anyone with it. So if the bankers decide to charge loans at 14.5% flat rate then this new law is minced meat? aka dead on arrival!!!! Wacha wajaribu. The issue will go to court and the courts will examine the spirit of the law when arriving at a decision. So, what do you think was the spirit of the law when enacted! I remember vividly the spirit of the law being used to convince @RAO in 2013 to accept and move on. The spirit then was "...kenya in bigger than an indifichuol..." The spirit now is "..." Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,634
|
KNM wrote:[quote=Wakanyugi][quote=KNM]This is how I see it playing out, should this law stand. For one, equilibrium will be reached. So good news for the pro-rate cap crowd. Well sort of... 1. Freeze/slow down in lending: Already began btw. By removing their ability to adequately price the risk into loans(coz thats whats happened!) then better safe than sorry. The leaked memo yesterday was just an example. All will follow suit esp with the unsecured loans. I don't see banks tightening the noose already around their necks. Banks primary business is to 'buy' and 'sell' money. So they stop doing that and do what? Sell mandazi?True. But why do you assume that it will be you they sell to? The biggest cheering squad is also the one that will be locked out. Mark you, the law is on rate only. So for existing loans, the duration may be extended outrageously. So if you're cheering your reduced loan...ole wako. Government, external markets are all avenues for growth. Less risky even.
OK, I'll pretend I understand your logic here and say, Good point. 2. Refusal of deposits Now plenty of people are confused by this. Nobody is saying a bouncer is at the door stopping you from depositing, it means less welcoming(free). Deposits believe it or not cost banks BIG time. Think of costs at point of deposit(branches, agents/cashiers/personnel, platforms), security of the deposits physical(guards, transit vans, safes) or digital(cybersecurity personnel), accounting (systems, personnel). Beforehand deposits paid for their own costs but now someone has to pay. I can guarantee banks are, as we speak, crunching the numbers. Transaction costs will rise(before you jump with the CS approval line, I'm talking about existing fees), ATM charges rising 100%--from around KES 30 to 60+ etc.Notice how personnel featured severally in the deposit-taking costs? Yep, lay-offs. Like I said someone has to pay. I know a few SACCO's that are salivating at this prospect. Banks are not the only deposit taking institutions around. As for bank layoffs, they have been doing that already.Are you saying SACCOs will replace banks? And even as they "eat" banks business they swell until they become...? Banks. Have you looked at the latest list of registered SACCO's, or listened to them advertise on Vernacular radio and TV? If Banks never worried before, they should now. 3. Fall of small banks, rise of big(ger) banks. Big banks will be able to weather the initial credit freeze. Deep pockets mean easy to diversify. Small banks not so much. And its a catch 22 situation for them. Deny credit and not make money. Lend at low rates and be forced to play with volumes game to break even, and with it risk of default shoots. People will see these banks again going under with customer deposits, coz of defaults. So yes M&As will happen but it will be big swallowing small. Consolidation in the Bank sector, ala Nigeria, is long overdue and if the bill accelerates it, well and good. I never bought the Governors argument about niche banking. It takes size and capital to take niche ideas to scale, which is what ultimately benefits the economy. So above you welcome competition from SACCOs but here oligopolies are good. Really? This is not about oligopoly. It is about safety through size, the capacity to innovate and scale and to compete outside our borders. We have too many banks for a small economy like Kenya. In any case, one of the worst kept secrets is that Banks in Kenya are a cartel. How else do you think they managed to effect State capture for so long? 4. Fall of production Forget the car/smartphone buying consumers for a sec. Businesses esp SMEs being locked out from credit access to fuel their expansion/survival. With that, loss of productivity, worsened by being in an election year. Businesses contract and at best, hiring freeze. More likely, further lay offs. There is little worse that can happen to SME's than is already happening to them now. Think of it: what kind of business could you do that will give you enough returns to service a loan at 25%? As for the fall in consumption lending, I say it can't come soon enough. SMEs were being weighed down, yes. But now they will be all out starved. In growth, slow>none>negative. So what is new? You starve me to death (the situation now) or choke me till I die (the new threat). Same difference. "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 7/3/2007 Posts: 1,634
|
MaichBlack wrote:Wakanyugi wrote:MaichBlack wrote:Angelica _ann wrote:MaichBlack wrote:President Uhuru has been a big disappointment on this one. He turned down the advice of Treasury and Central Bank for political reasons. He promised people lower interest rates in the last campaign and he is going to face them again.
He knows this law is f#*ked up (he was briefed by his technocrats) but he had politics/re-election to think about!! Central Bank as so pissed off they said they will not comment on the signing of the bill. Finance Secretary also refused to comment and referred questions to the Attorney General. Who are these other people who advised him to an extent of disregarding the advice of Treasury and CBK???
A president who is willing to mess the whole financial ecosystem to get re-elected is a big no for me! But this has guaranteed his re-election!!!! Politics and politicians, it is all about survival I doubt this will help him. I doubt Cordishians will vote for him just because he signed the bill. His die hard supporters would still have voted for him either way. He has actually lost the votes of some people. Yes he has lost the votes of Wazuans and their elitist kin. All 900 of them. Big deal As I said, as @guru said, he was to be re-elected before the bill and he will be re-elected after the bill. So relax because that is your biggest problem. My biggest problem is the economy so I cannot relax!!! So, we are catching feelings now, are we? I thought you tough banksters are supposed to have cash registers for hearts. "The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/25/2009 Posts: 4,534 Location: Windhoek/Nairobbery
|
Hello, tough times ...the banking sector used to be a darling o many...even a novice investor could close their eyes and pick a stock to ride...well this is no more...
I think after this purge has exhausted its blood trail & you are still standing...its better to check the following before investing in the sector
1. Banks with less reliance on interest income. A bank like CFC Stanbic comes to mind.
2. Banks whose regional subsidiaries contribute more than 20% of pretax profit I.e I&M & DTB?
3. Banks which dont have alot of corporate fixed deposits.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/2/2009 Posts: 26,328 Location: Masada
|
the deal wrote:Hello, tough times ...the banking sector used to be a darling o many...even a novice investor could close their eyes and pick a stock to ride...well this is no more...
I think after this purge has exhausted its blood trail & you are still standing...its better to check the following before investing in the sector
1. Banks with less reliance on interest income. A bank like CFC Stanbic comes to mind.
2. Banks whose regional subsidiaries contribute more than 20% of pretax profit I.e I&M & DTB?
3. Banks which dont have alot of corporate fixed deposits.
Elaborate point no. 3. Portfolio: Sold You know you've made it when you get a parking space for your yatcht.
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 8/16/2009 Posts: 994
|
Impunity wrote:Gatheuzi wrote:If what I hear is right "new law only applies to new loans going by today's statement by co-op" why is all this holla ballo about. Impact on banks interest income will take a while to go lower. First because banks will not refinance existing loans because that will be like shotting their @$$ez.
And now back to the MPs who passed the law hoping to coushion themselves after 2017 when we kick them out, how will they benefit. Were they damn to realize this loophole. Now I get it, someone advised this to "Kamwana" no wonder he signed it.
Back to my original question, why all the panick in sellers? @MB you are fine. Nothing will hurt your investments as long as existing loans are not affected. @Obiero, your mortgage remains as expensive as ever. @VVS you will keep paying top dollar on your loan even after 25th Sep. What if I take new loan from another bank at 14% and pay off the old loan taken at 21%? Early termination fee is usually small. Ama nafikiria vitu zangu? I think only a small fraction of the populace will achieve that. If 90% of say expensive unsecured borrowers intend to refinance among say top 5 existing banks this will simply be delt with by the banks talking in one language to cab it. It will also not work for mortgage account holders. The only beneficiaries might be secured corporates/SMEs Time is money, so money is time. Money saved is time gained in reverse! Money stores your life’s energy. You expend your energy, get paid money, and store that money for a future purchase made in a currency.
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/25/2009 Posts: 4,534 Location: Windhoek/Nairobbery
|
Impunity wrote:the deal wrote:Hello, tough times ...the banking sector used to be a darling o many...even a novice investor could close their eyes and pick a stock to ride...well this is no more...
I think after this purge has exhausted its blood trail & you are still standing...its better to check the following before investing in the sector
1. Banks with less reliance on interest income. A bank like CFC Stanbic comes to mind.
2. Banks whose regional subsidiaries contribute more than 20% of pretax profit I.e I&M & DTB?
3. Banks which dont have alot of corporate fixed deposits.
Elaborate point no. 3. Most banks will convert savings & fixed deposits to current accounts to avoid paying heavy interest expenses...its easy to convert Kamau's fixed deposit into a current account than for Britam...what you will see going forward is banks coming up with stupid products just to move your account
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 5/25/2012 Posts: 4,105 Location: 08c
|
the deal wrote:Impunity wrote:the deal wrote:Hello, tough times ...the banking sector used to be a darling o many...even a novice investor could close their eyes and pick a stock to ride...well this is no more...
I think after this purge has exhausted its blood trail & you are still standing...its better to check the following before investing in the sector
1. Banks with less reliance on interest income. A bank like CFC Stanbic comes to mind.
2. Banks whose regional subsidiaries contribute more than 20% of pretax profit I.e I&M & DTB?
3. Banks which dont have alot of corporate fixed deposits.
Elaborate point no. 3. Most banks will convert savings & fixed deposits to current accounts to avoid paying heavy interest expenses...its easy to convert Kamau's fixed deposit into a current account than for Britam...what you will see going forward is banks coming up with stupid products just to move your account Welcome back @deal, CFC was standing strong today! Even managed a positive movement (+2.04%) on today's trades Pesa Nane plans to be shilingi when he grows up.
|
|
Wazua
»
Investor
»
Economy
»
Law Capping interest rates
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|