Muheani wrote:Swenani wrote:whiteowl wrote:maka wrote:alma1 wrote:Do you seriously expect a monolith like safaricom partnered by scanad to play fair?
Even if anything is wrong, the media cannot say a peep. Notice how even the journalists in wazua stay away from safcom stories. lol
Lakini Nyakundi is more dangerous than Kabetes. I think after they took him to court a number of times, he has learned to back up his noise with documentation.
What is more interesting are the people who are retweeting him. lol Now that was very interesting.
Your right at @alma1 we have peeps who work at safaricom on this forum they can tell us how many directors Bob has sent home since he took over...some in circumstances very questionable...it was a matter of time before things came light....
He has been selling it as a cleanup exercise but it looks like he was putting his henchmen in position.48 laws of power?
Can
@Muheani and @FMR2011 confirm these allegations
Eehhhh......whereas i dont work there and am not in the report in anyway ..this guy works there @Bobcollymore
you can tweet him to confirm.
@Muheani you are not alone washing your hands like the fellow in the Jesus story. Even KPMG is declaring they are only auditors.
Safaricom + Scanad is a very dangerous combination for journalists. Kweli where do you think mandowo gets matching socks lol
The story in Ahmednassir's magazine was given a TOTAL ABSOLUTE UNEQUIVOCAL BLACKOUT.
You have to wonder what is more dangerous, reporting Eurobond or reporting the Huawei story.
Enyewe Kenyans were sold to the dogs eons ago and we think we have something called media.
Now Nyakundi is media. It's like Trump joining a monastery. You know it ain't right but the alternative has proved itself useless.
Thieves are not good people. Tumeelewana?