masukuma wrote:alma1 wrote:Lakini Harrydre, my prince buddy
Tell me
I hear there was a case in the UK where some people are actually in jail for bribing IEBC officials. As in they went to court and it was proven that they paid bribes to IEBC officials.
Are those IEBC officials free in Kenya or have they retired and quit their jobs and have been arrested?
Just asking non-partisanly. To get an idea.
Wale ambao walihongwa na mbeberu, ni wafanyakazi wa IEBC? Ama ni kelele za cord tu?
I hate to get into the "mechanics" of this but... what you have written is not exactly true! not entirely.
here is the thing
1) the people in the UK (smith and ouzman) are accused of sending bribes (they sent money) - that is a fact. They sent the bribe money to a middleman who would in turn pay the IIEC people. there was no communication between the IIEC people and S&O on bribes. All communication is with a middleman.
2. the SFO did not investigate to see if a) the money was actually legitimately asked for. b) if the money was actually sent to the IIEC people. Their case was proven once money was sent to the middleman
What the EACC is trying to establish is
1) Was there money asked for
2) Was the money received from the middleman.
So what IIEC people and the ones that were left are saying is... well... I never met this guy! he used my name to get money from his bosses and the agent is saying - I gave you money! That is the case that is currently at EACC.
Masukuma on this one you are wrong very wrong....Because I'm too sure those undermining laws have been wholly removed, I'll let the internets speak
These are not my words
SFO alleged that the offences took place between November 2006 and December 2010. The case dubbed the Chickengate scandal started on November 10, 2010 at the London court.
SFO also alleged that the defendants used inflated commission payments to overseas agents to mask bribes that were to be passed on to public officials involved in the awarding of contracts for printing ballot papers and certificates.
- See more at:
http://www.informereasta...574#sthash.EQ5zL443.dpufThe prosecution alleged that the largest bung was £337,993 which the SFO believes was paid by S&O to their agent in Kenya Trevy James Oyombra to pay corrupt officials at the IIEC.
During the cross examination, the prosecution alleged that the sum was agreed upon by the defendants and paid to the officials by Trevy out of his £380,859 commission of £1.4 Million.
The transactions took place for a period of 18 months and email exchanges between Trevy Oyombra and Nick Smith were read in Court.
- See more at:
http://www.informereasta...574#sthash.EQ5zL443.dpufIf you take time after removing your goggles go to the UK courts law cases, you shall find the people who were bribed.
Not allegedly bribed my friend. UK courts are very good when it comes to lack of evidence. But actually bribed.
My question to you and Kula Raha...If you remove Raila in the equation, should the bribee be working?
Raila shall milk this one to the very end. In politics you sacrifice a few then move on. That's what the NCCK is saying.
Thieves are not good people. Tumeelewana?