Black Jews AKA lost tribes of Israel - Page 4 - Culture - Wazua

Welcome Guest

Wazua » Club SK » Culture » Black Jews AKA lost tribes of Israel

Black Jews AKA lost tribes of Israel

Options

Previous Topic · Next Topic

Lolest!		#31 Posted : Wednesday, March 09, 2016 6:39:12 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma		masukuma wrote: Lolest! wrote: Quote: this includes the narratives of the dorobo and other early dwellers of this part of theNot planet. The Dorobo narrative is real. They owned most of the forested lands in Southern Kikuyuland Even upto the coming of the British, small groups of the Dorobo still existed separate from the Gikuyu! And a number of Kikuyu trace their ancestry from them yeah.... that's their recent narrative (500 years?) which is true... but if you take the clock back I am sure it won't tell you about the other people they found in their current place. not that it was uninhabited. The history of the world is such that more often than not history is written by the victors. Dorobo were victors for sometime - their narrative held until it was nearly overwritten by the newer victor. that is what I mean. These lands have always been inhabited we just don't know who those people were. So according to your theory, every point on earth was always inhabited??
Back to top		\|
User Profile

masukuma		#32 Posted : Wednesday, March 09, 2016 6:41:05 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi		by the way.. how different are the Tutsis to the Banyakole? All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
Back to top		\|
User Profile

masukuma		#33 Posted : Wednesday, March 09, 2016 6:59:41 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 10/4/2006 Posts: 13,823 Location: Nairobi		Lolest! wrote: masukuma wrote: Lolest! wrote: Quote: this includes the narratives of the dorobo and other early dwellers of this part of theNot planet. The Dorobo narrative is real. They owned most of the forested lands in Southern Kikuyuland Even upto the coming of the British, small groups of the Dorobo still existed separate from the Gikuyu! And a number of Kikuyu trace their ancestry from them yeah.... that's their recent narrative (500 years?) which is true... but if you take the clock back I am sure it won't tell you about the other people they found in their current place. not that it was uninhabited. The history of the world is such that more often than not history is written by the victors. Dorobo were victors for sometime - their narrative held until it was nearly overwritten by the newer victor. that is what I mean. These lands have always been inhabited we just don't know who those people were. So according to your theory, every point on earth was always inhabited?? well... not always... however human beings have walked the planet for around say...200k years.. if the cradle of humanity is east africa 200k years ago and the out of africa theory holds we have had human beings in east africa for longer period of time than anywhere else on the planet. it's not inconceivable that populations moved around over and over again. We are talking 200k years of human history! All Mushrooms are edible! Some Mushroom are only edible ONCE!
Back to top		\|
User Profile

¿		#34 Posted : Wednesday, March 09, 2016 7:28:15 PM
Rank: Member Joined: 6/4/2015 Posts: 604		masukuma wrote: ¿ wrote: masukuma wrote: Swenani wrote: masukuma wrote: Black jewry is fascinating... there is a book about it... apparently the Ashanti, Tutsi, Igbo, Zulu, Beta Israel, Maasai and many others claim to be jews... Who is a jew? Is it by birth, religion, culture, geography etc? apparently...By claim! if you look different from the people around you. if you have distinct cultures from those around you, if you have beaten them in war over and over again. Then Christianity shows up on your door step... you automatically associate with the conquests of the Israelites then draw an imaginary line between the so called lost tribes of israel (Samarians) and you... and then teach that to your kids... a couple of generations later - everyone has internalized the claim. Don't draw your definition of who a black Jew is supposed to be and fit them into it. the only common thing about jewry across all claimants is just that the claim to be jews... wewe yako ni?
Back to top		\|
User Profile

tycho		#35 Posted : Wednesday, March 09, 2016 8:31:37 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi		One would wonder what exactly is meant by 'Jew'. Is it a genotype? Is it a myth? @Masukuma has said somewhere above that 'genes tell everything'. So the question would be how do genes tell who is, and isn't a Jew? Well, genes can't speak by themselves. It's humans who study them who generate interpretations. So if a group defines itself as 'Jewish' then it must be due to some mythical creation... And if 'Jew' is a myth, then shouldn't all who embrace this myth qualify to be 'Jews'? I think all or most of these claims to 'Jewishness' are valid and true.
Back to top		\|
User Profile

Kusadikika		#36 Posted : Wednesday, March 09, 2016 9:30:32 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/22/2008 Posts: 2,721		tycho wrote: One would wonder what exactly is meant by 'Jew'. Is it a genotype? Is it a myth? @Masukuma has said somewhere above that 'genes tell everything'. So the question would be how do genes tell who is, and isn't a Jew? Well, genes can't speak by themselves. It's humans who study them who generate interpretations. So if a group defines itself as 'Jewish' then it must be due to some mythical creation... And if 'Jew' is a myth, then shouldn't all who embrace this myth qualify to be 'Jews'? I think all or most of these claims to 'Jewishness' are valid and true. I think the most common 'evidence' of being Jewish is male circumcision. Most communities that practice male circumcision somehow claim to be Jews. It may be true that they are descendants of Jews and carried out the practice as they wandered the earth. The other explanation is that once they were colonized they discovered in the colonizers bible something that they could identify with and thus claimed it as their own. Closer to home what intrigues me is the connection between the Merus and the Kisiis. They are so similar, could it be that they are the same people? At what point did they separate?
Back to top		\|
User Profile

alma1		#37 Posted : Wednesday, March 09, 2016 9:39:34 PM
Rank: Elder Joined: 9/19/2015 Posts: 2,871 Location: hapo		honestly why should you care in 2016 Ati the last jews. You are talking as if Jews are God's chosen. If you believe that, go die coz you are going to hell....like kesho Tafakari hayo Thieves are not good people. Tumeelewana?
Back to top		\|
User Profile

newfarer		#38 Posted : Thursday, March 10, 2016 7:26:20 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/19/2010 Posts: 3,505 Location: Uganda		An interesting thread where tycho is involved and I can understand what he's saying. punda amecheka
Back to top		\|
User Profile

Anti_Burglar		#39 Posted : Thursday, March 10, 2016 8:33:08 AM
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024		masukuma wrote: Lolest! wrote: masukuma wrote: Lolest! wrote: Quote: this includes the narratives of the dorobo and other early dwellers of this part of theNot planet. The Dorobo narrative is real. They owned most of the forested lands in Southern Kikuyuland Even upto the coming of the British, small groups of the Dorobo still existed separate from the Gikuyu! And a number of Kikuyu trace their ancestry from them yeah.... that's their recent narrative (500 years?) which is true... but if you take the clock back I am sure it won't tell you about the other people they found in their current place. not that it was uninhabited. The history of the world is such that more often than not history is written by the victors. Dorobo were victors for sometime - their narrative held until it was nearly overwritten by the newer victor. that is what I mean. These lands have always been inhabited we just don't know who those people were. So according to your theory, every point on earth was always inhabited?? well... not always... however human beings have walked the planet for around say...200k years.. if the cradle of humanity is east africa 200k years ago and the out of africa theory holds we have had human beings in east africa for longer period of time than anywhere else on the planet. it's not inconceivable that populations moved around over and over again. We are talking 200k years of human history! Those were not human beings.
Back to top		\|
User Profile

Lolest!		#40 Posted : Thursday, March 10, 2016 10:28:04 AM
Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma		Kusadikika wrote: Closer to home what intrigues me is the connection between the Merus and the Kisiis. They are so similar, could it be that they are the same people? At what point did they separate? Wako related. Historian Prof Ochieng once wrote about this. He pointed to the many similarities in language, names(Mugambi-Mogambi, Mungai-Mongai, Mararo-Moraro), culture etc According to him, the theory that Mt Kenya Bantus came from the South is incomplete. For them to come from the South, they passed via western Kenya and left their close brothers the Abagusii there. There developed differences after that between the Abagusii and their brothers because of environment and their interaction with neighbouring tribes(eg the Abagusii interacted with the Luo and ended up copying their names while Mt Kenya people interacted with the Maasai
Back to top		\|
User Profile

10 Pages«<23456>»

Wazua » Club SK » Culture » Black Jews AKA lost tribes of Israel

Forum Jump

You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Watch this topic
Print this topic

Normal
Threaded