Nope.The ground is hostile because the people are living in deplorable conditions and yet 'they are in the government'.The president is dishing out the goodies to those who didn't vote for him like in Mombasa,nyanza& western and nothing for central.They feel they are being taken like used condoms.Look at the state of the roads.

Uhuru is not Okuyus and Okuyus is not Uhuru.Not yet Uhuru

In the 1960s, Kenyatta and Oginga were friends. The British wanted Oginga to be president. They thought Kenyatta would be bad. I believe the governor referred to Kenyatta as "The leader unto hell"

Oginga so believed in Kenyatta that he refused the British offer and insisted that Kenyatta must be released and become the 1st president.

Shortly after independence, the two fell out because Oginga accused Kenyatta of being a land grabber. Kenyatta retaliated by firing Oginga and convincing kikuyus that Oginga was trying to prevent the Agikuyu from being prosperous.

Agikuyu believed Kenyatta and Oginga became the most hated person in central province. With Oginga sidelined, Kenyatta was able to continue with his land grabbing scheme, removing kikuyus and resettling them in Nakuru or Nyandarua.

This is the root of hostility between kikuyus and luos. Things only got worse when Tom Mboya was gunned down in broad daylight.

Since there is so much hostility there, it is very easy even today for leaders to create distrust between the two groups if it will benefit them. They do this by demonizing other leaders. And even so called educated elites fall for it.

History keeps repeating itself. Even today, Kenyan tribal chiefs are busy turning people against each other so they can prosper.

Our leaders have succeed in convincing us that criticism against a tribal chief is criticism against the entire tribe. This allows the tribal chiefs to continue looting . Look at Ruto with the Mau complex land grabbing scheme. He was grabbing land near water towers. When accused he shouted that RAO has betrayed the kalenjin. many believed him. Such is the power of a tribal chief. IN RV especially, people have been conditioned to belive that the prosperity of their leaders is paramount to the success and pride of the people.

Its a shame because in Kenya today, everyone has a relative who belongs to another ethnic group. If you are kikuyu, chances are that you have a luo relative. If you are a luhya, chances are that you have a Kalenjin relative. And so forth.
And when a tribal chief prospers via land grabbing or looting, the people he leads don't actually benefit. Some even become poorer. Some who are displaced end up living in hostile regions.

The perception of being beaten by rain is because We have just been lied to by our leaders.

The 2005 referendum was a rejection of a bad constitution. Uhuru Kenyatta was also was against the 2005 constitution. And even Kibaki later admitted that it was bad.

How did people end up believing that the
rejection of the 2005 constitution was a move against kikuyus?
The answer is people were lied to by their leaders.

As Kenyans we should be united against corruption and bad leadership. The average peasant of middle class fellow does not benefit when a person from their tribe steals. When anyone steals from the government, we all lose. Yet our leaders have conditioned us to believe that criticism of a tribal chief is a criticism of the whole tribe. This is what enables them to loot the treasury and grab land with abandon. They know they can depend on their tribe to support them.