Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Paris shootings - Terrorists attack
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
masukuma wrote:here is the big question.... what determines what 'text/scripture' to follow or what not to follow? here are two examples that come to mind as I pounder this... 1) In the story of Lot...Two men who were really angels appeared in Sodom where Lot lived with his family. The wicked men of the city surrounded Lot’s house seeking to have homosexual relations with the angels. Lot begged the men of the city not to do this evil thing, and he offered up his two virgin daughters to them instead. God rescued Lot coz he was "a righteous man, who was distressed by the depraved conduct of the lawless" - OK? 2) The story of the Benjaminite who gave his daughter and concubine out to be gang raped and later cut his concubine, limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel. Right?
My question - what enables you to dismiss this text and not kill your "concubine" or "give your daughers out for gang raping" or other myriad of really disturbing or ridiculous texts? What makes you not follow these ones to the letter? if you have that 'thing' that makes you not 'give your daughters out to gangs of robbers'... why not allow by pass the text for direction and use that 'thing'? Because some of the things in there are horrible and going forward we will have nut cases that literally believe these things and will consider themselves 'true' believers and with the ease of getting weapons - they may end up being your neighbour!
Sorry, I wonder how my reply to Swenani got mixed up with yours. Corrected!
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
Swenani wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Swenani wrote:This is just history repeating itself,No need to worry relax and masturbate in peace, it will come to pass.
What is the difference between the christian people's crusade and the radicalized Islamist jihadist? The difference is that both were radicalized by religion
Christianity is 2000 years old while Islam is 1400 years.The radicalized Jihadist are doing what the radicalized crusaders did 1000 years ago.
In 1000 years to come,there will be a radicalized version of Hamburglar who will be killing all the Christians, Jews, Muslims in the name of atheism!
Like Tycho said, ISIS has everything to do with Islam just like Peoples crusades had everything to do with Christianity but NOT the FAITH of Islam or Christianity!
Both the Jihadist and the crusaders are/were fighting the "Holy" war of intolerance! The difference, you ask? Well, it is happening now, in our lifetime, in the age of enlightenment, development, science and knowledge. Oh, and criticism. It doesn't matter,it's a learning curve 1. First it was the pagans who were killing the Christians and banning of Christianity , churches and temples in the years 300-400. 2.Then the Christians came, they were ,persecuting forcing conversion and killings by beheading of Jews and Muslims in the years 380-1900(I'm sure some Muslims, jews and African with their Gods were wondering why is this happening now in our lifetime of development and knowledge) So now its turn of the radicalized islams who are doing what some radicalized pagans and christians did(and of course you are here wondering why is this happening in this lifetime of exposure,development etc) Next it will be Hamburglar who will beheading your Christians,Muslim, Jews etc, from his post you can read some form of radicalization. Be still and know that He is God! 2. I am sure you will and can have a cute discussion with the pagans and the Jews of 380-1900 about their woes. When you are done with that perhaps you can also identify with the current victims and condemn their attackers. Hello?
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
Anti_Burglar wrote:Swenani wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Swenani wrote:This is just history repeating itself,No need to worry relax and masturbate in peace, it will come to pass.
What is the difference between the christian people's crusade and the radicalized Islamist jihadist? The difference is that both were radicalized by religion
Christianity is 2000 years old while Islam is 1400 years.The radicalized Jihadist are doing what the radicalized crusaders did 1000 years ago.
In 1000 years to come,there will be a radicalized version of Hamburglar who will be killing all the Christians, Jews, Muslims in the name of atheism!
Like Tycho said, ISIS has everything to do with Islam just like Peoples crusades had everything to do with Christianity but NOT the FAITH of Islam or Christianity!
Both the Jihadist and the crusaders are/were fighting the "Holy" war of intolerance! The difference, you ask? Well, it is happening now, in our lifetime, in the age of enlightenment, development, science and knowledge. Oh, and criticism. It doesn't matter,it's a learning curve 1. First it was the pagans who were killing the Christians and banning of Christianity , churches and temples in the years 300-400. 2.Then the Christians came, they were ,persecuting forcing conversion and killings by beheading of Jews and Muslims in the years 380-1900(I'm sure some Muslims, jews and African with their Gods were wondering why is this happening now in our lifetime of development and knowledge) So now its turn of the radicalized islams who are doing what some radicalized pagans and christians did(and of course you are here wondering why is this happening in this lifetime of exposure,development etc) Next it will be Hamburglar who will beheading your Christians,Muslim, Jews etc, from his post you can read some form of radicalization. Be still and know that He is God! 2. I am sure you will and can have a cute discussion with the pagans and the Jews of 380-1900 about their woes. When you are done with that perhaps you can also identify with the current victims and condemn their attackers. Hello? Be still and know that He is God! If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
Impunity wrote:I ask again " WHY IS POPE CALLING THIS WORLD WAR III"? He did? Has the terrorist excommunicator confirmed?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
masukuma wrote:here is the big question.... what determines what 'text/scripture' to follow or what not to follow? here are two examples that come to mind as I pounder this... 1) In the story of Lot...Two men who were really angels appeared in Sodom where Lot lived with his family. The wicked men of the city surrounded Lot’s house seeking to have homosexual relations with the angels. Lot begged the men of the city not to do this evil thing, and he offered up his two virgin daughters to them instead. God rescued Lot coz he was "a righteous man, who was distressed by the depraved conduct of the lawless" - OK? 2) The story of the Benjaminite who gave his daughter and concubine out to be gang raped and later cut his concubine, limb by limb, into twelve parts and sent them into all the areas of Israel. Right?
My question - what enables you to dismiss this text and not kill your "concubine" or "give your daughers out for gang raping" or other myriad of really disturbing or ridiculous texts? What makes you not follow these ones to the letter? if you have that 'thing' that makes you not 'give your daughters out to gangs of robbers'... why not allow by pass the text for direction and use that 'thing'? Because some of the things in there are horrible and going forward we will have nut cases that literally believe these things and will consider themselves 'true' believers and with the ease of getting weapons - they may end up being your neighbour!
Interpretation is subject to many things. There's a study called hermeneutics which involves many things, principally symbols and their psycho-spritual connections. An analogy would be for each event there's a 'quantum level' concerned. How to discriminate? 'Frequency' consonance, 'valence', and to return to hermeneutics, consistency of metaphor and use in propelling a particular metaphor forward.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
Swenani wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Swenani wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Swenani wrote:This is just history repeating itself,No need to worry relax and masturbate in peace, it will come to pass.
What is the difference between the christian people's crusade and the radicalized Islamist jihadist? The difference is that both were radicalized by religion
Christianity is 2000 years old while Islam is 1400 years.The radicalized Jihadist are doing what the radicalized crusaders did 1000 years ago.
In 1000 years to come,there will be a radicalized version of Hamburglar who will be killing all the Christians, Jews, Muslims in the name of atheism!
Like Tycho said, ISIS has everything to do with Islam just like Peoples crusades had everything to do with Christianity but NOT the FAITH of Islam or Christianity!
Both the Jihadist and the crusaders are/were fighting the "Holy" war of intolerance! The difference, you ask? Well, it is happening now, in our lifetime, in the age of enlightenment, development, science and knowledge. Oh, and criticism. It doesn't matter,it's a learning curve 1. First it was the pagans who were killing the Christians and banning of Christianity , churches and temples in the years 300-400. 2.Then the Christians came, they were ,persecuting forcing conversion and killings by beheading of Jews and Muslims in the years 380-1900(I'm sure some Muslims, jews and African with their Gods were wondering why is this happening now in our lifetime of development and knowledge) So now its turn of the radicalized islams who are doing what some radicalized pagans and christians did(and of course you are here wondering why is this happening in this lifetime of exposure,development etc) Next it will be Hamburglar who will beheading your Christians,Muslim, Jews etc, from his post you can read some form of radicalization. Be still and know that He is God! 2. I am sure you will and can have a cute discussion with the pagans and the Jews of 380-1900 about their woes. When you are done with that perhaps you can also identify with the current victims and condemn their attackers. Hello? Be still and know that He is God! Why don't you tell this to the terrorists and their prefects? How can I be the one to be told this, twice?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
Anti_Burglar wrote:Impunity wrote:I ask again " WHY IS POPE CALLING THIS WORLD WAR III"? He did? Has the terrorist excommunicator confirmed? What are the marks of previous world wars? Have they been met now? To me, we are in world war 3.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
tycho wrote:Anti_Burglar wrote:Impunity wrote:I ask again " WHY IS POPE CALLING THIS WORLD WAR III"? He did? Has the terrorist excommunicator confirmed? What are the marks of previous world wars? Have they been met now? To me, we are in world war 3. Several countries in war at the same time?
|
|
|
Rank: User Joined: 8/15/2013 Posts: 13,237 Location: Vacuum
|
Once you start believing that your god and religion is superior than other gods and religions, you are radicalized and that's how the senseless arguments, hate and killing start If your god is superior than other gods, he doesn't need you to argue for him, kill for him, protect for him etc because he is not weak! All you need to do is be still and know that He is GOD... Ni hayo tu! If Obiero did it, Who Am I?
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 9/11/2015 Posts: 1,024
|
Swenani wrote:Once you start believing that your god and religion is superior than other gods and religions, you are radicalized and that's how the senseless arguments, hate and killing start
If your god is superior than other gods, he doesn't need you to argue for him, kill for him, protect for him etc because he is not weak!
All you need to do is be still and know that He is GOD... Ni hayo tu! Now you are talking! Consider the following statement: Alphdoti is very mad at someone because of how they depict God. He has a problem with how their depiction of God and he has taken it upon himself to 'correct' that 'mistake'. He believes he has a superior understanding of God and that his religion is the correct one. Alphdoti is radicalized, and senseless. He argues a lot about it and his friends (who also believe like he does) go a step further and hate and kill others who don't believe like them. This is what I'm trying to say here.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Paris shootings - Terrorists attack
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|