These guys must be crying (kulilia kwa choo) on why they had to kill Gadaffi. Things started going bananas when they killed Gadaffi.He used to be the kichungi for Africans wanting to go to Europe and he used to be given so much money especially by Italy (Berlusconi) and when he died, the routes were opened. It is said he used to haul the Africans into prisons and then send them back to their countries.When he died, the immigrants started flooding Italian islands and with them were also the former rich libyans who could no longer live the luxurious lifestyle enjoyed during Gadaffis era.First came Africans and then the Arabs due to the Arab spring which brought some Tunisians and Egyptians and for some time now there have been Syrians.Any one who have watched news know from january,more than 400000 refugees have entered Europe.
When other European (Geographic non UE) citizens like from Macedonia saw refugees are coming and getting a save haven they have also decided to cross the border.As you say, this is going to lead to extrimism and racism will go high.

Do not forget, countries like Germany are welcoming most of them with open hands coz their population is getting old btu they can't welcome everyone.There also issues coz they are welcoming Syrians who are muslims and if there was a choice, they would better welcome Macedoans than Syrians.Germany has a very high population of Turks who came kitambo.So Islam + terrorism = extremism. Its a wait and see.

Because religion is a lie. Deep down inside themselves, they know the infidels (Non-religious people) tend to be better thinkers (intelligent) and have by-far better morals than the religious people. That you can take to any SACCO of your choice.

Because religion is a lie. Deep down inside themselves, they know the infidels (Non-religious people) tend to be better thinkers (intelligent) and have by-far better morals than the religious people. That you can take to any SACCO of your choice.

Similar questions. UAE Qatar Kuwait SA are more richer and geographically near. Why then to EU

Five of the wealthiest Muslim countries have taken no Syrian refugees in at all, arguing that doing so would open them up to the risk of terrorism.

He said: “The records of Gulf countries is absolutely appalling, in terms of actually showing compassion and sharing the responsibility of this crisis… It is a disgrace.” None of the Gulf States signed the 1951 Refugee Convention, which legally defines a refugee as “A person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality”. However, they have taken refugees in the past.