Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Is it corruption or lack of transparrency ?
Rank: New-farer Joined: 6/14/2011 Posts: 82
|
At the start of last year, I wrote to the Cabinet Secretaries of Interior, Foreign Affairs, and Defence ministries, showing how the government could go about in getting some FREE Seahawk planes.
One way being through the UN, and specifically the United Nation Security Council Resolution [UNSCR] 1540.
The manufacturer of the plane, already being appointed by UN 1540 Committee as one of its 'Facilitator' had proposed to work with the government in seeing that it get some FREE Seahawk planes.
The paramilitary Seahawk plane can effectively denies water transport to dangerous forces and smugglers of all kinds, and allows the government to project its control into remote areas where there are no airfields exist.
Its can also be fitted with sophisticated imaging systems and weapons sufficient to make it a potent force in action against hostile forces. Its ability to land almost anywhere, on land or water, makes it ideal to insert special operations personnel in critical areas.
The Seahawk planes can be used in the fight against terrorism, piracy, anti-poaching, patrolling vast polar boundaries and interdicting drugs trafficking in either on land or sea.
The Seahawk plane is designed to carry 6 people and with a range of more than 700 miles, it can reach more distant areas than any helicopter, and at about one-tenth the operating cost. With a cruise speed of 142 mph, it can reach critical areas much faster than any boat, and do so with advantage of an aerial view of the scene.
Standard power is a 505-horsepower engine that consumes ordinary automobile gasoline, so that it can more readily operate in remote locations where aviation gasoline may not be available. Usually, its selling price is on a range of US$975,000.00
Since introducing this offer to the government, nothing had been heard from the.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 8/25/2015 Posts: 839 Location: Kite
|
Maybe they don't understand your english! That bird is hot if it can land on water!
|
|
|
Rank: New-farer Joined: 8/27/2015 Posts: 15 Location: Nairobi
|
UN Security Council Resolution 1540 deals specifically with non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Link here: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540 (2004)As for the Seahawk, you are talking about equipment exclusive to the US Navy and with a price starting at USD 40 million. Those are not things that are given out for free.
|
|
|
Rank: New-farer Joined: 6/14/2011 Posts: 82
|
While UNSCR 1540 require ALL members of U.N.to implement programs to control the presence of weapons of mass destruction [WMD], such as nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons, in their territory, and that includes securing national borders. The UN also recognizes that most nations do not have resources to work on the WMD problem, and therefore, the 1540 Committee keeps a secret list of donor nations that are willing to GIVE material help to countries that request assistance to comply with the 1540 resolution.
The 1540 Resolution require every member State to adopt programs to prevent "non-state actors" [i.e, terrorists]from obtaining, possessing, or transporting weapons of mass destruction{WMD}and their component materials.
The major activities that members states are asked to carry out in a '1540 compliance program' are:
1. Secure their borders so that contraband WMD materials cannot move across them.
2. Enact and prosecute laws to prohibit 'non-state actors' from making, possessing, or transporting weapons of mass destruction.
3.etc !
Sir, There do exist some USA aviation companies that do manufacture some lethal Seahawk aircraft for a price as low as US$950,000.00
|
|
|
Rank: New-farer Joined: 8/27/2015 Posts: 15 Location: Nairobi
|
WMD's, in this case referring to "nuclear, chemical and biological weapons" are not an active threat in this part of the world. Based on that I doubt Kenya would qualify for "technical assistance" which is what you are referring to.
May I ask which Seahawk are you referring to? The only active military aircraft I can find by that name is the US Navy version of the infamous Sikorsky Blackhawk.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 8/25/2015 Posts: 839 Location: Kite
|
Mike Will wrote:WMD's, in this case referring to "nuclear, chemical and biological weapons" are not an active threat in this part of the world. Based on that I doubt Kenya would qualify for "technical assistance" which is what you are referring to.
May I ask which Seahawk are you referring to? The only active military aircraft I can find by that name is the US Navy version of the infamous Sikorsky Blackhawk. This infamous one,can it land on water?
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 7/1/2011 Posts: 8,804 Location: Nairobi
|
@¿, has reminded us to think about our thinking, or rather to look at how we're thinking; and this is probably one of those crucial places where we should do that.
One thing I realize I should do is to accept my failures without lashing out at others. That way, I suspect I won't burn my bridges and I can try again, and again, learning and transforming along the way.
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 6/8/2010 Posts: 1,734
|
Does the UN use the same or they use some old russian and canadian planes/choppers that you clap when they land paying some astronomical figures. More corrupt than the whole of African govts combined Life is an endless adventure
|
|
|
Rank: New-farer Joined: 6/14/2011 Posts: 82
|
Taurrus wrote:Maybe they don't understand your english! That bird is hot if it can land on water! Inspired by legendary Republic Seabee,that was originally designed for Air-Sea rescue of pilots, the Seahawk is built on a hull intended from the keel up to land and take-off in the open sea in contrast to other sea-planes, that require "sheltered watered" for successful operation. As a true amphibian, it can also operate from the land, or go easily from land to water and the vice versa. A reversible propeller permits the Seahawk to move in reverse on the ground and in water, and the high wings permits to dock easily wherever a boat can tie up.
|
|
|
Rank: New-farer Joined: 6/14/2011 Posts: 82
|
Taurrus wrote:Mike Will wrote:WMD's, in this case referring to "nuclear, chemical and biological weapons" are not an active threat in this part of the world. Based on that I doubt Kenya would qualify for "technical assistance" which is what you are referring to.
May I ask which Seahawk are you referring to? The only active military aircraft I can find by that name is the US Navy version of the infamous Sikorsky Blackhawk. This infamous one,can it land on water? Yes, Sir, believe it or not, but the plane can land on ocean, sea, lakes and even some mighty rivers! To give you bit of a lesson on UN 1540 Committee implementation compliance requirement! The donor-matching program was a good concept. But still not attractive enough to induce many of developing nations to create 1540 compliance programs. The attitude seemed to be," What does it benefit our country, if we are given equipment to look for WMD to secure the rich nations when we do not think WMD are threat to us?" As a result, the 1540 Committee sweetened the pot a little more in 2010,in a conference in Lima, Peru. There they announced 'dual use, dual benefit' policy. The policy broaden the scope of donated equipment to build dual capacity in developing nations- the concept is to provide equipment which can be used to achieve to secure border, or to control WMD, and which also can serve to fulfil some also critical needs of the nation receiving the donation. I will advice you to do some more thorough research in aviation industry in USA, and see how many companies uses the name Seahawk, for their sea-planes !!
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
Is it corruption or lack of transparrency ?
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|