.

LVG has decided he needs a martial plan to rescue us suffering fans. And it comes in form of 19 year Monaco forward prospect. Not looking very rossy but i hold the faith. Oneunited

http://www.espnfc.us/sto...lls-at-deadline-reports

I don't know what happened here but this is not good for De Gea and even Utd

Blown away? Not sure about that. Madrid waited all summer to make a deal and I am sure Untied wanted Navas their way. So It is a lose-lose situation for United, Madrid and De Gea coz all parties wanted it sorted.

So it is actually Navas who held up the deal longer than expected.

Something to that effect. For Chelsea, I am trying to figure out who screwed up? Was it over-estimation of the current team by Mou, or the Board, or Roman?

Usually, we do business ruthlessly, this window we have been like Arsenal...all fart and no shit!

Actually,, midtable teams have done better business than top teams. Common refrain has been few players were available and prices were highly inflated.
It was clear that Chelsea were on a decline towards the end of last season. Fabregas-Matic. combo isn't working ,Terry is a pensioner and Ivanovic is the weak link.

Lose-lose? Manutd will pay wages for two unhappy Spanish keepers who will then walk away for nothing next summer.
Word has it the documents were one minute late.Sadly, it is rumoured that Madrid needed cash to finance the move and had offered Isco to gunners.

Boss, Man U didnt have a problem keeping De Gea for one year. It is usually factored in contracts. Pesa iko. They were also willing to sell but at a good fee. Valdes move breaking down wasnt as a result of Man U, but deal between player and Besiktas. Not everything seen is a crisis.

Unknown to who?

The other huge statement the mighty Man U wanted to make was that they are NOT a selling club like aseno. Cash is never in short supply.

In other words, you don't walk in and simply pluck out a player as if Old Trafford is Emirates.