Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:
Let me repeat what I said, there are instances of corruption that may be deemed as just.
The legal systems I know have an exceptional view of justice. That's why lawyers exist.
Like which instance?
Resolving a trumped up criminal case by paying the arresting officers a fraction of your bond or cash bail may be an instance of distributive justice.
Why cast your lot with the children of darkness?
Aren't we enlightened enough?
After this question I decided to look at possible patterns and trends from the least corrupt to most corrupt countries and I found that:
1. The least corrupt countries had well defined political structures that went deep into the past, had little or no internal or external destabilizing factors, were harmonious with global powers and global market trends, and had relatively high incomes.
2. Most corrupt countries had a reversal of the above named factors in toto or in most of the above factors.
So when we consider a country like Kenya and check for these factors it's not difficult to see how and why corruption is so endemic. Our political pedigree is shaky, our conformity and harmony with global powers and the concomitant market structures ambivalent, and our earnings are low.
So for me, I realize that demonizing others, alienating ourselves politically, and even seeking to suppress and punish corrupt behavior are PR stunts and are likely to increase and entrench corruption.
But if we accept our corruption status and look at how corruption serves us and how it hampers our growth in the light of our context we can generate practical and workable solutions.