Simple Waitiki demands for compensation, the land already under squatters, then let them remain there and let waitiki wait for compensation and see who gives in first

I will be a bit blunt here now but it is this idiocy exhibited by @Rahatupu to call historical injustice a fallacy that is at the heart of many land problems. It is in the interests of those who own land, any land even the small plots of lands to have a compassionate interest in the resolution of the land question. To understand that the platform on which your rights to own land and property stands also supports the rights of other people from being disenfranchised and dispossessed.

As it is the only people who agitate for land reforms are those who have been dispossessed and the only solution they seem to offer is the one described by @jagger above. The land owners on the other hand @Rahatupu and co think that there is no problem to be resolved and the landless squatters should go hang.

My argument is that those who own land should have a greater interest in the matter than that shown by Rahatupu. They should be at the forefront in advocating for resolutions in the form of re settlements or compensation for the squatters. I don't claim to know what the correct way to handle the matter is but engagement is important. Waitiki has a greater responsibility than to sit with his title like a victim and demand 10 billion shillings for his land. He should be more engaged than that.

I am sure Rahatupu would have some respect for a man like John Kibunga Kimani. Here is a man who has worked and saved to become a billionaire but still understands that you cannot wish away the problem of squatters.

@ wanyee,nimeona ukichungulia.Kaburoti kakitajwa ndio unatkelezea?Urioho mundu?

@Kusadikika , My great grandfather and their entire clan were evicted from Karen Hardy area by Karen Blixen and company as early as 1905. They were squeezed in the current areas of Dagoretti, Thogoto and Kikuyu. Now advise me in a very pragmatic way how these people can be compensated before we come to Waitiki's case that is more straightforward.
That Waitiki bought the land is not in question. That no people occupied the same prior to the Muhindi is not in question. That the so called squatters are economic migrants seeking false "haki yao" is open for all to see.
REAL squatters exist only within the Sheriani vipi no areas where they were subjects of forced labour by both the Mazrui and later colonial administrations. All other coastal populations are landed people like the Maasai but their land is not titled.