guru267 wrote:@2012.. the conflict started the day after the poll results were announced and ended the day after the coalition was formed on paper and that can hardly be called tribal wars... and let us not forget what happened in 1992...
the conflict was very political but it just so happened that the two parties were supported by different tribes..
but with 2012 no one will be seeking re-election and conflict usually arises when the incumbent doesnt want to leave..
@guru
People didn't just wake up one day and decided to fight. It was planned long before. The reason I say it was tribal is for the obvious reason that the militia were organised in tribal groupings. If you read the reports, no two tribes joined forces. There was nothing political in 2008, let's not confuse tribal chiefs for politicians. Politicians fight for agendas and beliefs not self gratification.
Ooops! This threads is turning into politics. My apologies, let's go back to the issue at hand.
BBI will solve it :)