ecstacy wrote:Why did Fatou Bensouda publish information which the International Criminal Court (ICC) threw out as un-substantive, sensational, and completely fictitious?...
For reasons other than the victims, her masters must be very very very disappointed with the case outcome. Now its mudslinging.
Let us just keep in mind the ICC Judges dismissed this so called evidence on grounds it is not admissible in court nor does it meet minimum threshold of review-able evidence.
This word FACTS seems to be extremely hard for you to grasp.
Bensouda did not publish information in her dreams.
In the same ruling that dismissed Uhurus case, the judges in their wisdom, ordered the prosecution to publish her case to the public.
Small tiny details like that always escapes apologists.
Jose: If I make it through this thug life, I'll see you one day. The Lord is the only way to stop the hurt.