TAZ wrote:@Smano Now compare Man Utd's assessment to the Arsenal's....
http://www.espnfc.com/cl...642/arsenal-report-card
Hii ni ubaguzi, why should Arsenal get a C yet they also had numerous injuries and still had to contend with CL fixtures. Btw I think its a fallacy to claim that Man Utd have done well but i agree with the fact that they've improved.
"As it is, Van Gaal has certainly improved United noticeably, especially when it comes to results and confidence, but it is hard to imagine that any other manager,
with this level of investment, would not have made similar improvements."
How many of those "investments" have played even half of 19 games? That's where the "good" performance comes from. Considering where we finished with Moyes last season, No.3 at the first half is very good by my standards. Remember the target for Man Utd is Top 4, talk of title contention only came up after we won 7 in 8, now 9, and Chelsea and City slipped up marginally.
As for Arsenal, kila team na shida zake...
I envy Chelsea (or their backroom staff to be more precise); Ivanovic, Terry and Cahill have played all games. Azpilicueta has only been reolaced ny Felipe Luis maybe twice. With a regular solid back 4, the title is theirs to lose...
BEER IS LIVING PROOF THAT GOD LOVES US AND WANTS US TO BE HAPPY!