Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2008 Posts: 4,449
|
The Arab League has today vowed to use all means possible to fight IS as well as support international efforts against IS - including use of military force. On the IS side, they have released another propaganda video showing more mass killings of captured Syrian soldiers - http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=48b_1410120425
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 12/27/2012 Posts: 2,256 Location: Bandalungwa
|
Some Sunni leaders are turning against ISIL Quote:THE institutional voices of Sunni Islam have been slow to respond to the orgy of beheadings, mass-executions and sectarian cleansing promoted by jihadists of Islamic State (IS) in their so-called caliphate. So slow, in fact, that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia last month publicly chastised the ulema, the body of clerics and scholars to whom ordinary Muslims are meant to turn for religious guidance, for their silence and “laziness”.
One group of liberal-leaning British preachers issued a warning for Muslims to shun the group, which it described as heretical, extremist and poisonous. Saudi Arabia’s senior official cleric, who represents the puritan Wahhabist school of thought, pronounced IS “the number-one enemy of Muslims”. Several prominent sheikhs, who in the past have loudly championed jihadist groups including al-Qaeda, dismiss IS as modern-day Kharijites, a reference to fanatical “seceders” who in the first century of Islam declared all other Muslims to be infidels, and waged war against them. Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi, a Jordanian preacher recently released from prison, accuses IS of driving a wedge between Muslims. His comments are striking because he was once spiritual mentor to Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, who led the forerunner of IS and was killed in an American air strike in 2006.
In a recorded “debate” over walkie-talkies with IS fighters that was broadcast on radio stations of rival rebel groups, a Syrian cleric, Sheikh Hussam al-Atrush, made every effort to expose their ignorance of Islam. Their so-called caliphate, he said, “has done nothing but incite hatred and disgust for the mujahideen.”
Raising the ante still further, Sheikh Nasser al-Shithri, an ultraconservative Saudi preacher, recently blasted IS, in effect excommunicating its adherents as “apostates worse than Jews, Nazarenes [Christians] or even heathens” who, he alleged, failed correctly to enforce Islamic law or even the proper veiling of women. Sheikh Saleh al-Fawzan, another prominent Saudi cleric known for extremist views (such as sanctioning slavery and counselling that Arab Muslims should be banned from marrying non-Arabs) decried the would-be caliphate as a creation of “Zionists, Crusaders and Safavids”—the last of which is an insulting reference to Shias. Other Wahhabist sheikhs have similarly claimed that IS leaders are secret agents of Iran, or of a broader Western-Shia conspiracy.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
Alhpdoti, Alphdoti, Alphdoti. Why should I produce the torah when I have the Qu'ran and I am talking to a muslim? Sit down and read the Qur'an first, you muslim! You are straining at your tethers to go elsewhere but we will dwell only in the Qur'an, thank you very much. I present the Qur'an. It is the book under our focus. Are you not familiar with these verses in the Qur'an? Do you read the Qur'an? Quote:37:99 And [then] he said, "Indeed, I will go to [where I am ordered by] my Lord; He will guide me. 37:100 My Lord, grant me [a child] from among the righteous." 37:101 So We gave him good tidings of a forbearing boy. 37:102 And when he reached with him [the age of] exertion, he said, "O my son, indeed I have seen in a dream that I [must] sacrifice you, so see what you think." He said, "O my father, do as you are commanded. You will find me, if Allah wills, of the steadfast." 37:103 And when they had both submitted and he put him down upon his forehead, 37:104 We called to him, "O Abraham, 37:105 You have fulfilled the vision." Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good. 37:106 Indeed, this was the clear trial. 37:107 And We ransomed him with a great sacrifice, 37:108 And We left for him [favorable mention] among later generations: 37:109 "Peace upon Abraham." 37:110 Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good. 37:111 Indeed, he was of Our believing servants. What you have said about the atonement is what I expect you to say, so its not really a new thing to me. Then the only conclusion you can agree with is that that verse (37:107) should not have been there in the Qur'an. Because if the boy was ransomed with a great sacrifice (and which is symbolic), why not another, why not you? Why not me? Why not all of us? Why do we have to die when Allah can pay a price for us and we live? He did it for the boy why not all of us? Therefore either 1. this is a mistake in the Qur'an, so the Qur'an is not Allah's word -it is lies, mohammed is a liar or 2. Allah made a mistake, he told mohammed a lie, Allah is a liar. Which one is it, Alphdoti? And you have not answered one of my questions. You said the sacrifice was symbolic. 1. So who did the boy symbolize? 2. Who did the fine sheep symbolize? 3. What did the great sacrifice symbolize?
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/17/2009 Posts: 1,049
|
duplication Just as absolute power corrupts leaders, so does absolute fanaticism blind the people from logic
|
|
|
Rank: Veteran Joined: 11/17/2009 Posts: 1,049
|
Quote:[quote=ecstacy] The Arab League has today vowed to use all means possible to fight IS as well as support international efforts against IS - including use of military force. On the IS side, they have released another propaganda video showing more mass killings of captured Syrian soldiers - http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=48b_1410120425[/quote] Why this late in the day! The west showed leadership in this matter while the larger middle east couldn't find its voice! Just as absolute power corrupts leaders, so does absolute fanaticism blind the people from logic
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
Muriel wrote:Alhpdoti, Alphdoti, Alphdoti. Why should I produce the torah when I have the Qu'ran and I am talking to a muslim? Sit down and read the Qur'an first, you muslim! You are straining at your tethers to go elsewhere but we will dwell only in the Qur'an, thank you very much. I present the Qur'an. It is the book under our focus. Are you not familiar with these verses in the Qur'an? Do you read the Qur'an? Quote:37:99 And [then] he said, "Indeed, I will go to [where I am ordered by] my Lord; He will guide me. 37:100 My Lord, grant me [a child] from among the righteous." 37:101 So We gave him good tidings of a forbearing boy. 37:102 And when he reached with him [the age of] exertion, he said, "O my son, indeed I have seen in a dream that I [must] sacrifice you, so see what you think." He said, "O my father, do as you are commanded. You will find me, if Allah wills, of the steadfast." 37:103 And when they had both submitted and he put him down upon his forehead, 37:104 We called to him, "O Abraham, 37:105 You have fulfilled the vision." Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good. 37:106 Indeed, this was the clear trial. 37:107 And We ransomed him with a great sacrifice, 37:108 And We left for him [favorable mention] among later generations: 37:109 "Peace upon Abraham." 37:110 Indeed, We thus reward the doers of good. 37:111 Indeed, he was of Our believing servants. What you have said about the atonement is what I expect you to say, so its not really a new thing to me. Then the only conclusion you can agree with is that that verse (37:107) should not have been there in the Qur'an. Because if the boy was ransomed with a great sacrifice (and which is symbolic), why not another, why not you? Why not me? Why not all of us? Why do we have to die when Allah can pay a price for us and we live? He did it for the boy why not all of us? Therefore either 1. this is a mistake in the Qur'an, so the Qur'an is not Allah's word -it is lies, mohammed is a liar or 2. Allah made a mistake, he told mohammed a lie, Allah is a liar. Which one is it, Alphdoti? And you have not answered one of my questions. You said the sacrifice was symbolic. 1. So who did the boy symbolize? 2. Who did the fine sheep symbolize? 3. What did the great sacrifice symbolize? Quran sura Al Saffat chapter 37:107 " And We ransomed him with a momentous sacrifice:" @muriel, the "sacrifice" here, described as great or momentous may be understood both in a literal and a figurative sense. Abraham was ordered to sacrifice his son 1. Literally it means a fine sheep or ram was substituted. 2. symbolically, it is his willingness, it symbolizes his own sacrifice i.e. sacrificing the ram, because this animal is his, and he is making the sacrifice. 3. Why momentous? This figurative sense is even more important. It was indeed a great and momentous occasion, when two men, with concerted will, demonstrated self-sacrifice in the service of Almighty God. We see this sense when Jesus (pbuh) said, " he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it", (Matthew 10:39 ) So this was a test from God to Abraham. This was not to wipe anybody's sins. No. It was testing Abraham's willingness to the work of Allah (Almighty God).
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 2/26/2008 Posts: 4,449
|
Nandwa wrote:Quote:[quote=ecstacy] The Arab League has today vowed to use all means possible to fight IS as well as support international efforts against IS - including use of military force. On the IS side, they have released another propaganda video showing more mass killings of captured Syrian soldiers - http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=48b_1410120425[/quote] Why this late in the day! The west showed leadership in this matter while the larger middle east couldn't find its voice! The Wahhabists in Qatar and UAE as well as Sunni's in Saudi Arabia with help from some Turks quite happy to fuel further IS 'success'.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
AlphDoti wrote:
1. Literally it means a fine sheep or ram was substituted. 2. symbolically, it is his willingness, it symbolizes his own sacrifice i.e. sacrificing the ram, because this animal is his, and he is making the sacrifice. 3. Why momentous? This figurative sense is even more important. It was indeed a great and momentous occasion, when two men, with concerted will, demonstrated self-sacrifice in the service of Almighty God. We see this sense when Jesus (pbuh) said, "he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it", (Matthew 10:39 )
What non sense is this? Alphdoti??????? (Reading and understanding my big brother has surely helped me understand Alphdoti's 'explanations' that are no explanations, big up my brother!). Ati Abraham was to literally sacrifice his son to symbolize sacrificing a fine sheep? Read the Qurán Alphdoti and understand it! What are you thinking?? The sacrifice was symbolic - true. The players in the sacrifice were Abraham, the son, the fine sheep and the act of sacrificing and of course Allah. 1. who did Abraham symbolize? 2. Who did the boy symbolize? 3. Who or what did the fine sheep symbolize? 4. what did the great sacrifice symbolize? A literal sacrifice was to be done, that is, blood was to be literally shed and someone was to literally die. This was to symbolize something or an event or whatever and that is what we are probing, Alphdoti! As we do this we should not forget to identify who between Mohamed and Allah is the liar who put 37:107 in the Qurán. (al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat fit here.)
|
|
|
Rank: Elder Joined: 6/20/2008 Posts: 6,275 Location: Kenya
|
Muriel wrote:AlphDoti wrote:
1. Literally it means a fine sheep or ram was substituted. 2. symbolically, it is his willingness, it symbolizes his own sacrifice i.e. sacrificing the ram, because this animal is his, and he is making the sacrifice. 3. Why momentous? This figurative sense is even more important. It was indeed a great and momentous occasion, when two men, with concerted will, demonstrated self-sacrifice in the service of Almighty God. We see this sense when Jesus (pbuh) said, "he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it", (Matthew 10:39 )
What non sense is this? Alphdoti??????? (Reading and understanding my big brother has surely helped me understand Alphdoti's 'explanations' that are no explanations, big up my brother!). Ati Abraham was to literally sacrifice his son to symbolize sacrificing a fine sheep? Read the Qurán Alphdoti and understand it! What are you thinking?? The sacrifice was symbolic - true. The players in the sacrifice were Abraham, the son, the fine sheep and the act of sacrificing and of course Allah. 1. who did Abraham symbolize? 2. Who did the boy symbolize? 3. Who or what did the fine sheep symbolize? 4. what did the great sacrifice symbolize? A literal sacrifice was to be done, that is, blood was to be literally shed and someone was to literally die. This was to symbolize something or an event or whatever and that is what we are probing, Alphdoti! As we do this we should not forget to identify who between Mohamed and Allah is the liar who put 37:107 in the Qurán. (al-Lat and al-Uzza and Manat fit here.) The same Bible says " God says I need no blood", " I don't need the blood of animals", less of human beings? So this was a test from God to Abraham. This was not to wipe anybody's sins. No. It was testing Abraham's willingness. The act itself symbolizes. Not the person doing.God Almighty, He ordered Abraham to sacrifice his son. And when he was ready, God says it was his willingness that He was interested in, not the flesh of Ismael (or Isaac debate for another day) or even sheep or goat. This was just to symbolize his willingness that he was prepared to cut an animal because it symbolizes our own sacrifice. This animal is ours. And we are making the sacrifice. NOTE: How do you call the verse a liar when it matches what is in the Bible? Your problem runs deep. It is not about this verse. You have an underlying problem. Even if this verse was not there, you'd still use those words.
|
|
|
Rank: Member Joined: 11/19/2009 Posts: 3,142
|
alphdoti, Lets revise the verse 37:107 Quote:And We ransomed him with a great sacrifice, Allah can ransom someone. Allah can pay a price for someone. Allah says he ransomed someone with a great sacrifice. Someone was to die but Allah interposed and he did not die. Why should allah ransom, pay a price for anyone so that he escapes his fate? He should meet his fate. Of course my problem runs deep. If I think Mohammed or Allah can lie in the Qurán then is not the problem a big one? Is it little to you? Do you think this is a joke, Alphdoti? Is this funny to you? 37:107 indeed matches a few things in the bible but it does not match many things in the Qur'an. You should meet your fate. You should not be ransomed.
|
|
|
Wazua
»
Club SK
»
Politics
»
The Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant
Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.
|