wazua Sat, May 9, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

13 Pages«<910111213>
Complete and consistent Juche
kysse
#101 Posted : Wednesday, June 11, 2014 9:17:28 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 1/17/2013
Posts: 4,693
Location: Earth
This wakanyugi ni 'baba yao'
tycho
#102 Posted : Wednesday, June 11, 2014 10:05:27 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 7/1/2011
Posts: 8,804
Location: Nairobi
Wakanyugi
#103 Posted : Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:30:53 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,635
tycho wrote:
If both brothers chose, and arrived at the city of desire, then both are equal in strength.

Help? Both, equally.



Both brothers have not arrived. The only thing they can be certain of is this: they will either succeed together or fail together.

But clearly they have chosen to interpret this principle in very different ways.

Back to my question: "Which brother....?"

"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
marko
#104 Posted : Thursday, June 12, 2014 12:08:04 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 1/7/2007
Posts: 838
After reading all this I now have a serious urge to drink some whisky.
WHO DARES WINS
Muriel
#105 Posted : Thursday, June 12, 2014 8:20:03 AM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/19/2009
Posts: 3,142
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
If one considers the history of Man, and even the history of the Universe, and his subjectivity, several things become clear. Among them;


Tycho, I was going to respond to your post when I saw the above non sequitur. Surely, the Universe by its very nature and definition (as all that is) can not have a history or a future. It simply is.



Hello there Wakanyugi?

I am glad to see you here with us.


Thanks Muriel.

Maybe you can help our brother Tycho. Sometimes he takes this illusion stuff too seriously.

Like the man who walks into a pub, orders a few beers, gets drunk and then thinks inebriation is his permanent state.

I worry that brother Tycho is going to wake up with a 'maduong' hangover one of these days. smile


lol ,,,,,,,,, I will be here with beverage and accompaniment ,,,,,,,,,, as we sing the rhyme ,,,,, lol.

Brother at times is just stubborn. I have a different opinion about Marianne Williamson (I am pro-separateness) but I get what you are putting across.


Muriel,

What is your beef with Marianne?

By the way I completely separate a persons writing from their personality. I am yet to meet a writer whose persona equaled their writing.


Indeed, and why is it, that the persona and the writing are different?


I believe the creative endeavor is the platform on which human beings best express their greater, unlimited self. Their god-self if you like.

The product of a well executed creative process therefore tends to seem greater than the person who created it.

This is my theory anyway.



Wakanyugi, interesting.

I believe a person should and will own up and take responsibility for his actions and inactions, words and deeds.

I do not believe in 'I wouldn't do it - its the angel/devil/karma/him/her/whoever-i-visualize/etc who made me do it.' mentality. As if there is no free will. Slave mentality.

That is why just to say 'I'm sorry, I apologise.' is too hard for some people and people within his sphere of influence ends up affected one way or another. Especially when he tries to explain it away after hurting someone instead of owning up.

Sorry for digressing there ,,,,,,,

Its funny that here we switch sides pro-differentiation, pro-separateness (of person and personality). Intriguing! How can I now explain myself? Help!
symbols
#106 Posted : Thursday, June 12, 2014 11:38:55 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/19/2013
Posts: 2,552
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
If one considers the history of Man, and even the history of the Universe, and his subjectivity, several things become clear. Among them;


Tycho, I was going to respond to your post when I saw the above non sequitur. Surely, the Universe by its very nature and definition (as all that is) can not have a history or a future. It simply is.



Hello there Wakanyugi?

I am glad to see you here with us.


Thanks Muriel.

Maybe you can help our brother Tycho. Sometimes he takes this illusion stuff too seriously.

Like the man who walks into a pub, orders a few beers, gets drunk and then thinks inebriation is his permanent state.

I worry that brother Tycho is going to wake up with a 'maduong' hangover one of these days. smile


lol ,,,,,,,,, I will be here with beverage and accompaniment ,,,,,,,,,, as we sing the rhyme ,,,,, lol.

Brother at times is just stubborn. I have a different opinion about Marianne Williamson (I am pro-separateness) but I get what you are putting across.


Muriel,

What is your beef with Marianne?

By the way I completely separate a persons writing from their personality. I am yet to meet a writer whose persona equaled their writing.


Indeed, and why is it, that the persona and the writing are different?


I believe the creative endeavor is the platform on which human beings best express their greater, unlimited self. Their god-self if you like.

The product of a well executed creative process therefore tends to seem greater than the person who created it.

This is my theory anyway.



Wakanyugi, interesting.

I believe a person should and will own up and take responsibility for his actions and inactions, words and deeds.

I do not believe in 'I wouldn't do it - its the angel/devil/karma/him/her/whoever-i-visualize/etc who made me do it.' mentality. As if there is no free will. Slave mentality.

That is why just to say 'I'm sorry, I apologise.' is too hard for some people and people within his sphere of influence ends up affected one way or another. Especially when he tries to explain it away after hurting someone instead of owning up.

Sorry for digressing there ,,,,,,,

Its funny that here we switch sides pro-differentiation, pro-separateness (of person and personality). Intriguing! How can I now explain myself? Help!

Wakanyugi
#107 Posted : Thursday, June 12, 2014 12:21:21 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 7/3/2007
Posts: 1,635
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
If one considers the history of Man, and even the history of the Universe, and his subjectivity, several things become clear. Among them;


Tycho, I was going to respond to your post when I saw the above non sequitur. Surely, the Universe by its very nature and definition (as all that is) can not have a history or a future. It simply is.



Hello there Wakanyugi?

I am glad to see you here with us.


Thanks Muriel.

Maybe you can help our brother Tycho. Sometimes he takes this illusion stuff too seriously.

Like the man who walks into a pub, orders a few beers, gets drunk and then thinks inebriation is his permanent state.

I worry that brother Tycho is going to wake up with a 'maduong' hangover one of these days. smile


lol ,,,,,,,,, I will be here with beverage and accompaniment ,,,,,,,,,, as we sing the rhyme ,,,,, lol.

Brother at times is just stubborn. I have a different opinion about Marianne Williamson (I am pro-separateness) but I get what you are putting across.


Muriel,

What is your beef with Marianne?

By the way I completely separate a persons writing from their personality. I am yet to meet a writer whose persona equaled their writing.


Indeed, and why is it, that the persona and the writing are different?


I believe the creative endeavor is the platform on which human beings best express their greater, unlimited self. Their god-self if you like.

The product of a well executed creative process therefore tends to seem greater than the person who created it.

This is my theory anyway.



Wakanyugi, interesting.

I believe a person should and will own up and take responsibility for his actions and inactions, words and deeds.

I do not believe in 'I wouldn't do it - its the angel/devil/karma/him/her/whoever-i-visualize/etc who made me do it.' mentality. As if there is no free will. Slave mentality.

That is why just to say 'I'm sorry, I apologise.' is too hard for some people and people within his sphere of influence ends up affected one way or another. Especially when he tries to explain it away after hurting someone instead of owning up.

Sorry for digressing there ,,,,,,,

Its funny that here we switch sides pro-differentiation, pro-separateness (of person and personality). Intriguing! How can I now explain myself? Help!


Muriel,

I have always believed that we, each of us, is responsible for the reality we create, so I am with you completely on this. This does not mean that others have no influence on our reality. But that we are responsible for letting them, when we do.

In recent years I began to find massive evidence that this is not just a moral/spiritual fact but a scientific one too. For instance, I recall reading Michael Talbot's "The Holographic Universe," years ago and a proverbial light going on in my head.

As to "...pro-differentiation, pro-separateness (of person and personality)." I think Tycho put it quite well.

There is no difference between the creater and the creation.



"The opposite of a correct statement is a false statement. But the opposite of a profound truth may well be another profound truth." (Niels Bohr)
Lolest!
#108 Posted : Thursday, June 12, 2014 1:25:44 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 3/18/2011
Posts: 12,069
Location: Kianjokoma
I'm suing you thimioniLaughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly

People think I'm crazy laughing peke yangu!!
simonkabz wrote:
tycho wrote:
simonkabz wrote:


Is this an African @Simon?


Im sorry sir, please don't bombard me with those things! Sitarudia haki.

Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly Laughing out loudly

stuff that can make one an addict of painkillers!smile

Laughing out loudly smile Applause d'oh! Sad Drool Liar Shame on you Pray
Muriel
#109 Posted : Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:50:55 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/19/2009
Posts: 3,142
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
Muriel wrote:
Wakanyugi wrote:
tycho wrote:
If one considers the history of Man, and even the history of the Universe, and his subjectivity, several things become clear. Among them;


Tycho, I was going to respond to your post when I saw the above non sequitur. Surely, the Universe by its very nature and definition (as all that is) can not have a history or a future. It simply is.



Hello there Wakanyugi?

I am glad to see you here with us.


Thanks Muriel.

Maybe you can help our brother Tycho. Sometimes he takes this illusion stuff too seriously.

Like the man who walks into a pub, orders a few beers, gets drunk and then thinks inebriation is his permanent state.

I worry that brother Tycho is going to wake up with a 'maduong' hangover one of these days. smile


lol ,,,,,,,,, I will be here with beverage and accompaniment ,,,,,,,,,, as we sing the rhyme ,,,,, lol.

Brother at times is just stubborn. I have a different opinion about Marianne Williamson (I am pro-separateness) but I get what you are putting across.


Muriel,

What is your beef with Marianne?

By the way I completely separate a persons writing from their personality. I am yet to meet a writer whose persona equaled their writing.


Indeed, and why is it, that the persona and the writing are different?


I believe the creative endeavor is the platform on which human beings best express their greater, unlimited self. Their god-self if you like.

The product of a well executed creative process therefore tends to seem greater than the person who created it.

This is my theory anyway.



Wakanyugi, interesting.

I believe a person should and will own up and take responsibility for his actions and inactions, words and deeds.

I do not believe in 'I wouldn't do it - its the angel/devil/karma/him/her/whoever-i-visualize/etc who made me do it.' mentality. As if there is no free will. Slave mentality.

That is why just to say 'I'm sorry, I apologise.' is too hard for some people and people within his sphere of influence ends up affected one way or another. Especially when he tries to explain it away after hurting someone instead of owning up.

Sorry for digressing there ,,,,,,,

Its funny that here we switch sides pro-differentiation, pro-separateness (of person and personality). Intriguing! How can I now explain myself? Help!


Muriel,

I have always believed that we, each of us, is responsible for the reality we create, so I am with you completely on this. This does not mean that others have no influence on our reality. But that we are responsible for letting them, when we do.

In recent years I began to find massive evidence that this is not just a moral/spiritual fact but a scientific one too. For instance, I recall reading Michael Talbot's "The Holographic Universe," years ago and a proverbial light going on in my head.

As to "...pro-differentiation, pro-separateness (of person and personality)." I think Tycho put it quite well.

There is no difference between the creater and the creation.






Wakanyugi,

What do you know? A flood light just came on for me in my head!

Thank you, thank you.
Muriel
#110 Posted : Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:54:27 PM
Rank: Member

Joined: 11/19/2009
Posts: 3,142
symbols wrote:




Laugh
Laugh
Laugh

Affliction!

Laugh
Laugh
Laugh
13 Pages«<910111213>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.