@poundfoolish I'm not denying you the recognition of raising point no.4. That is a possibility, if there is anything like that. What I responded about is you calling me names. That's where we differ.

If you want to raise a possibility and discuss it, please go a head, without associating others with it. That is called allegations. That is what I'm cautioning you about.

If you know what "Radical Islamist" is and you know who recruited them and you know them, then it is up to you. But when you bring my name into it, then I say tueshimiane. Because I can see you are still a stooge of Western media, even when you're shown a fact that some these so called terrorist acts are actually planned by some garments, you still don't hear. What is your ears for? When the same garment carry out terror acts, some in front of your face, and you know it is him, then that same garment turns arounds and tells you no, it is so and so... you just join the band-wagon.

NOTE: Remember the story of monkeys beating the new comer who tries to pick the bananas on the tree?

Sasa where does dialogue come in here?

I doubt whether Islam is the threat it's generally portrayed to be, especially under the title of 'radical Islam'. The political and technological reality on the ground is not conducive for such an eventuality.

What's happening seems like a deliberate creation of fear and mistrust and one must be careful not be too hasty to condemn others, and be dilligent in investigation.

For example, doesn't it seem odd, like in this case, no matter how the Muslim youth respond, they're still suspect? Won't such a position radicalize them indeed?

So who kills the 'radical clerics'? Non radical Muslims? Non radical non Muslims? If the killers in this case are 'non radical', why the extra-judicial killings?

Such reasoning is false @kysse. Let me show how. You say;

1. Those who are on an international wanted list, without any due process, can be discriminated, and are radical. While the list makers aren't 'radical'. Here, 'radical' loses meaning and becomes political interest and expediency.

2. Because those who make international lists are not questioned, then one can't speak of 'non radicals'. The category can't be proven.

3. If both non radical Muslims and radical Muslims are killed, then Islam can't be the critical factor.

4. If Islam isn't the critical factor then the premise of radicality fails again.

5. Therefore it's impossible to make a reasonable and just conclusion under the circumstances.

6. No. five leads to the creation of true radicalism since there'll be action based on selfish political interest and disregard of the law.