Muriel wrote:tycho wrote:We need to be sure that we are stating the problem correctly.
I see 'terrorism' as a form of warfare in the global order. It is organized around defeating the idea of the status quo and its state system.
So clearly, all isolationist policies like building walls, denying other humans places of refuge and at the same time not being involved in problem solving amongst peoples and nations should be out of question.
To the extent that the status quo and the state system and the global order is changing, 'terrorism' then is winning the war.
'Terrorism' is a force that has come out of the weaknesses of the current state system, and as such it may appear to be winning. But paradoxically, it can't achieve its aims. As an idea it can only replicate itself to destruction.
And so far, even nation states are using terror and militancy to hold together and to expand political interests. That's how states weaken and terrorism unsettles.
So the answer is to develop robust counter measures through statecraft.