@Mkenya, Kuwa mpole, when correcting somebody.

Hata mimi @TAZ amenishangaza hapo, FellainI has always been on the radar....itwas just a matter of time.

@nostopping that"s what happens when you fail to trigger a release clause and then come back for the same player a few hours to deadline day

I'm surprised on one has set the fact straight on this issue. Man United paid 23.5m for Fellaini. I repeat 23.5 - the exact amount that was stated in the expired release clause. Everton announced the deal as WORTH 27.5m to them because Fellaini waived the bonus that would have been due to him. This would have amounted to 4m!!! Habari ndiyo hio. Of course News outlets will continue to report the more "romantic" 27.5 but it would be nice for people to get the facts right.

Having said that, as I said earlier, the way Man United conducted business this window was TOTALLY AMATEURISH!!! At this rate, we might need a director of football!! Moyes might not take it kindly but the club is bigger than anyone and it is not there to massage anyone's ego!

Although this is taking to far, and has an extremely slim chance of ever happening, how about having Sir Alex as the first Director of Football? What?? Can't a brother dream?

And by the way, how have Arsenal fans survived for 8 years?? A month of comedy and a loss to Liverpool is TOO MUCH for any Man United fan to take. Arsenal have been living like this for 8 years!! Man, Arsenal fans must be strong. That or they went past their elastic limit long time ago!

@ Maich....Man Utd paid £27.5m for Fellaini, the 4m you are talking about was actually a creation of the media. Everton have already clarified the issue

"For those asking: No Felli did NOT pay £4m of the transfer fee! The buying club (Man Utd) will pay £27.5m." Everton's director of communications Alan Myers

http://www1.skysports.co...f-marouane-fellaini-fee

There are unconfirmed reports indicating that RVP is unhappy with Moyes.

http://metro.co.uk/2013/...oss-david-moyes-3949452/

@TAZ - It depends who you chose to believe. Man United insisted they didn't pay a penny above 23.5m, then Everton said they didn't say Man United paid 27.5. All they said is the deal is worth 27.5m to them. Now they insist it is Man United that paid the whole 27.5m!

Both sides have reasons to lie. Man United [Our confused pair] wouldn't want to be seen to have paid 27.5m for a player who was available for 23.5m a month earlier. Everton would want people to know that they let their prized player leave to a desperate suitor on the deadline day [more like deadline minute] and were unable to extract more money than was stated in the expired release clause and instead chose to 'punish' their royal servant by taking his DESERVED loyalties from him.

Rink

As already noted by a section of the media Perez is just trying to appease the Madrid fans who feel the club messed up by letting the German star leave.....stats show he was one of their best players (probably second to CR7) on the pitch. As a fan of the club all i'm concerned with is how Ozil conducts himself on the pitch. Besides Ozil is a devout Muslim who recites Holy Qur'an before every single match so i really doubt he's a "party animal" as claimed, i don't even think he takes alcohol. From what i've read the major issue they had with him was his frequent trips to Italy to visit his girlfriend...that should not really be a concern. I think CR7 is more of a football diva than Ozil....

Memories are made of this. Fellaini the new Roy Keane