Here is what you need to know!

Everybody has always thought I just allege. Now you know who made 'Qa*da', 'Shab*b' (if there are anything like that)). Now you know what uncle Sam is capable of creating imagined enemies.

For those who were disputing 911 theories, please look out for 911 documentaries and learn more.

People have been feeding on Western propaganda without thinking. This has been people's worse undoing. TO a point where people could not see double standards.

Now @muganda after your enlightening post above, let us now define the term.

After 1990
they gave the word "Terrorism" a whole new meaning. Something totally different.

What is the definition of terrorism?
Somebody made their own definition of terrorism.
I was taught that a word in a language had meaning, and definition does not change from day to day, from time to time, from place to place. An apple is apple in China, and it does not become an orange in America.

Nobody...
And a president of Uncle Sam or a president of Europe or Australia or any country does not change the name of terrorism or the meaning of it because of his idea. It's a definition and according to the language, it has to remain as definition.

So if you go to any English dictionary
and see what is the definition of terrorism. Not the definition that just came 70 years ago, or 20 years ago, not the definition that the Americans or British or Australians give. Not a special definition. No. And pay attention, and after you check the definition, we can speak about some actions which have been done in the last 200 hundred years since this definition was made.

Let us check out the definition of terrorism


I have listed before historically a few examples
They never defined any of those actions, any of these barbaric, tragic intrusions, criminal occupation, distabilization, murder and protracted crimes on humanity, they never called terrorism.

It's unbelievable how a concepts
could be forced on the world with their eyes wide open, and all the lives and all the time, that people even learned ones, know these things, when they are talked about it, with temselves, and don't understand where our problems are rooted.

So if you start a criminal group. And you find some people who can be paid to join the group. And you train them, fund them, supply them with arms, give them any support they need... to promote political instability in a certain region!

Now you have compromised these people, they are now going against the teachings of their religion, no guidance, but they keep their names. They must look as normal people as possible. They must look like they are the representatives of their religion. Now they are just Muslims by name, but not following any Islamic teachings. They are misled, compromised by money, now recruited into a 'cult' by the founders. They must now carry out their founders mission; Kill innocent people...

So with the menace of the group, other rebel groups come in to fight against them. Now it become civil war within the society.
And the fighting spreads, with more players getting involved.

Then you achieve your intended political instability in that region!

Then eventually, after being used and dumped, the founder wants you dead.

Is it no very ironical to see the founder of the group turning back and telling people this is a terror group? Yet they even contract with them?

Can we say the founder of these terror groups is guilty or not?

This is the strategy of the founders.

We the majority of the people, 99.9999% have condemned this. Even Muslim organizations, they condemn it. We have condemned what happens in terror cases we have seen where people are killed.

If you see the person who did it has a Muslim name. And whoever do this, killing innocent human beings is not following Islamic teachings. So he is not a Muslim. He just have a Muslim tag. He is working for someone.

And that person is not going to stand besides me on Judgement day. He will be among the other killers, pedophile, rapists etc. He will be dinning with kina Hitler, Wanugu etc. Wanugu is not going to stand with pastor on judgement day just because he was a Christian.

So what we find, it is these guys who create this thing, then they take the media which portray that Muslims are doing it. Those who have been recruited become the black-sheep in the community (and there are black-sheep in every community). And now these so-called Muslims who kill innocent human being are not Muslims. They are not following teachings of Islam.

But now to achieve their political agenda, the media owned by these planners, pick them up and portray as though they are exemplary Muslims. It is the strategy of the media to malign Islam.

The media can change black into white, day into night, hero into villain, villain into hero.

IMPORTANT:
What we find is that no religion teaches killing of innocent human beings. But there are more non-muslims killing innocent human beings yet their religion says don't kill