Cde Monomotapa wrote:the deal wrote:PKoli wrote:murchr wrote:Kenya's sovereign bond may be priced between 7.625% per annum and 8.125% per annum" Mr @H_Rotich
Timetable for issuance?
Very expensive bond...local 15 year bond is at 12.375%...whats the point of issuing a massive foreign currency denominated bond at 8.125%? E.g Shilling tanks 10% all of a sudden gava will be in trouble...a bond like this only makes economical sense at 6.0-6.5%...
The point is that the envisioned capital goods will be imported in USD. So the question is whether to mitigate FX volatility during project life cycle by having a stash of ready USDs or borrow locally and keep sweating the USD/KES every time a "chuma" is required from abroad?
Your guess is as good as mine.
Also, during the tenor of the Eurobond (10yrs), exports should be up; oil, minerals, agriculture, services, FDI, Portfolio inflows etc.
More clean energy to cut oil imports, local food security via the irrigation project in Galana and such likes.
The bond does make sense lower but considering how long it's taken they must pay the market price with is around 475-525bps above 10yr US treasuries based on existing African Eurobonds. They'd also need the reserve buffer to fend off any speculative KES attacks but the fact is that they must maintain high domestic interests to reduce fx volatility. EA yields are still higher comparatively to emerging markets which augurs well for KES. The current a/c isn't going to improve but the perception of Kenya abroad is still positive. Read below.
http://www.bloomberg.com...-selloff-to-deepen.html
Domestic debt is pretty expensive at the moment and the Eurobond is more or less an avenue to reduce refinancing risk (10yrs) and reduce domestic borrowing (local bond yields). Issuance should be within the next 40 days (launch to finish) so looking at mid April for it to be completed. We can only borrow externally when the timing is right, which seems to be between our elections (unfortunate that tapering is complicating the situation).
They have a limit of $1.75bn for foreign borrowing so even in the event of an over subscription they stick to only borrowing $1.5bn. They are estimating that the next 3 year will require 100bn in infrastructure spending so the suggestion of rolling over the 2012 syndication into a 3 year tenor is also timely.
Over the next few years they'll be able to explore cheaper (concessionary) funding from the IMF and China. But the fact that we are a country that has huge twin deficits means that we must grab on these opportunities when they come even if they're expensive. The potential headaches in the future will be with county government borrowing which must be guaranteed by the central government.
A task force is being set up to manage potential liabilities and I can imagine the lobbying they'll face from the current crop of governors. We all know counties can't mobilize much revenue so they'll be looking to borrow locally should they be unhappy with current allocations. Do the counties have the ability to manage their liabilities when Treasury has only just managed to build their debt sustainably?
“We are the middle children of history man, no purpose or place. We have no great war, no great depression. Our great war is a spiritual war, our great depression is our lives!" – Tyler Durden