kamundu wrote:tycho wrote:The family should let the hospital keep the body.
What a careless comment to a grieving family.
On the contrary @Kamundu. The hypocrisy of this situation is what I see no reason to spare. For example, what rationality is being employed by a national hospital to it's 'poorest'?
If the hospital administration are as rational and humane as you wish to show, why is it that the story has to be brought to Wazua for the family to be referred to the social worker? Doesn't it sound odd that this grieving family has no clue that such services exist?
Even the person who wrote the bill should have referred them to the family. But he was indifferent.
Or is it that the social worker is testing the family's limits?
Then, why are you not suggesting that we contribute to the family? Why didn't @Pastor M?
Why didn't I? Because I have no money to give? You can simply have no money to give, because if you give one you must give all. Otherwise you must discriminate against some humans.
And clearly this very poor family is being discriminated against. And I can understand how being poor feels like. Life is so much discrimination till you start discriminating against yourself.
I remember one day, begging at the hospital's car park. I had exhausted the social worker. So I walk to this respectable man, and explain my situation, and the man gently refers me back to the social worker. That's when you discover you are poor indeed.
And I fear this may be what the family is going through. And I speak to them as a 'comrade'. If they are bottom rock, they have nothing to lose but their chains. They should start focusing on living and let the dead bury the dead.