Rank: Elder Joined: 3/18/2011 Posts: 12,069 Location: Kianjokoma
|
Wendz wrote:Lolest! wrote:Wendz wrote:[quote=kizee1]
the sword cuts both ways, the media has made it seem like women alone would be affected, but as you point out many women own property so the issue of fairness is moot
That's the thing. people are just jumping up and down and these are the questions we need to be asking.... not getting all emotional about the whole thing. Anyone can own property and women these days are clinching well paying jobs and doing massive investments. Infact, if you ask many of these real estate sellers they'll tell you there are many many women buying these houses.... I think the point is to be objective and deal with real issues.
If laws are to be passed which concern families, they need to be done by very sober people.... i don't know if our parliament is that sober. this is not a battle between men and women. it should be a battle to maintain the least disruption to the family as much as possible, before, during and even after the marriage. It shouldnt create a situation where one party takes advantage of the other. For example, we have as many Mbuguas these days as we have young gals ready to reap where they did not saw. May be what you owned before marriage is yours, 50/50 for property acquired DURING marriage if marriage lasts 10+ years.... less than that, you take home what you have invested in.... something like that. wewe toa goggles. would it have been fair for Mbugua if he had divorced Wambui after one year to have an equal share?? It cuts boh ways, YES! Especially now that we have these professional women who are all monied but are male repellant. Wakizeeka they might look for a twenty something year old. @  .... do you work for any media house(half-baked reporting) or who's got muddy goggles now? wewe mami, pewa some koolaid by @amores. Angalia your posts hapa. You say it cuts both ways and then make it a woman issue. Goggles
|