'Monister'? I don't know what that is.
But seriously; seems to be talking about SCOM (though that should be 40b and not 40m shares) and the widely peddled fallacy that if the shares are 'consolidated' or 'reverse-split' by a factor of ten,the market capitalisation would increase....still,I can't understand where s/he expects the sh5 dividends to come from. My dear friend,companies don't just 'decide' to 'give' dividends. The money comes from REAL profits earned! Have a look at SCOM's EPS....
Nothing is real unless it can be named; nothing has value unless it can be sold; money is worthless unless you spend it.