wazua Thu, Apr 16, 2026
Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics | Log In

1,588 Pages«<3233343536>»
Kenya Airways...why ignore..
Gordon Gekko
#331 Posted : Friday, October 25, 2013 9:04:42 AM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 5/27/2008
Posts: 3,760
Its great that KQ is getting the 777-300, but it is not a game changer. They have always had the 777-200 (which are in seriously dilapidated state) and in need of replacement. The -300 will not open new routes, but replace the existing -200s, the only advantage being an extra 100 or so seats and extra belly space. In fact, if the -200 crew cant fly the -300, it means that KQ will have to maintain three sets of crew specifically for one plane, and those are overheads.
VituVingiSana
#332 Posted : Friday, October 25, 2013 10:00:08 AM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/3/2007
Posts: 18,368
Location: Nairobi
Gordon Gekko wrote:
Its great that KQ is getting the 777-300, but it is not a game changer. They have always had the 777-200 (which are in seriously dilapidated state) and in need of replacement. The -300 will not open new routes, but replace the existing -200s, the only advantage being an extra 100 or so seats and extra belly space. In fact, if the -200 crew cant fly the -300, it means that KQ will have to maintain three sets of crew specifically for one plane, and those are overheads.
Bingo!
- 1 plane is not a game changer as you point out. Only when the 787s come in consistently will a difference be made.
- Does KQ still have the ancient 767s? Those need to go! The 777-200 is a great plane in comparison!
- Boeings are designed in a manner that the crew that flies the 777-200 should be able to fly the 777-300 [& they would have been trained on the new plane]
- Until the staffing is sorted out, KQ will still face problems.
Greedy when others are fearful. Very fearful when others are greedy - to paraphrase Warren Buffett
rest.easy
#333 Posted : Friday, October 25, 2013 10:55:52 AM
Rank: New-farer

Joined: 7/9/2010
Posts: 39
VituVingiSana wrote:
Gordon Gekko wrote:
Its great that KQ is getting the 777-300, but it is not a game changer. They have always had the 777-200 (which are in seriously dilapidated state) and in need of replacement. The -300 will not open new routes, but replace the existing -200s, the only advantage being an extra 100 or so seats and extra belly space. In fact, if the -200 crew cant fly the -300, it means that KQ will have to maintain three sets of crew specifically for one plane, and those are overheads.
Bingo!
- 1 plane is not a game changer as you point out. Only when the 787s come in consistently will a difference be made.
- Does KQ still have the ancient 767s? Those need to go! The 777-200 is a great plane in comparison!
- Boeings are designed in a manner that the crew that flies the 777-200 should be able to fly the 777-300 [& they would have been trained on the new plane]
- Until the staffing is sorted out, KQ will still face problems.


Even the 787's are not coming in huge numbers. Only one is scheduled for delivery soon. Link

Only one probably to be delivered in Q2 next year. Yet Ethiopian will be operating 8 787's around the same time.
murchr
#334 Posted : Friday, October 25, 2013 2:51:48 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 2/26/2012
Posts: 15,980
Time for some education the 777-300 is replacing no plane, its an addition will fly the to china. The 787 (dreamliners) will replace the 767s not 777s, over the years. 787s are a smaller plane but fuel efficient. And dont forget that KQ has been receiving embraer planes every other month. Ethiopian flies boeing planes even short distance eg Addis - Nbo
"There are only two emotions in the market, hope & fear. The problem is you hope when you should fear & fear when you should hope: - Jesse Livermore
.
Cde Monomotapa
#335 Posted : Friday, October 25, 2013 10:32:59 PM
Rank: Chief

Joined: 1/13/2011
Posts: 5,964
KQ flaunting the new plane. See pictures on @KenyaAirways
Sufficiently Philanga....thropic
#336 Posted : Saturday, October 26, 2013 1:42:02 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 9/23/2010
Posts: 2,225
Location: Sundowner,Amboseli
Cde Monomotapa wrote:
KQ flaunting the new plane. See pictures on @KenyaAirways

Kenya@50smile
@SufficientlyP
obiero
#337 Posted : Saturday, October 26, 2013 5:21:16 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 6/23/2009
Posts: 14,302
Location: nairobi
Sufficiently Philanga....thropic wrote:
Cde Monomotapa wrote:
KQ flaunting the new plane. See pictures on @KenyaAirways

Kenya@50smile

What KQ is doing is good and should yield some results.. Let nay sayers talk until release of results in a few days time.. How can we compare Ethiopian to KQ? We know Ethiopian is an NGO-like outfit
COOP, IMH, KEGN, KQ, MTNU
Gordon Gekko
#338 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 6:51:48 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 5/27/2008
Posts: 3,760
Engineer Kamau decrees that henceforth all gaarment officials must fly KQ. The following day WSR jets in onboard a KLM. Is it a case do as I say, not as I do? Or is it that ICC flights are personal and not underwritten by the tax payer?
Horton
#339 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:08:59 PM
Rank: Veteran

Joined: 8/30/2007
Posts: 1,558
Location: Nairobi
VituVingiSana wrote:
Gordon Gekko wrote:
Its great that KQ is getting the 777-300, but it is not a game changer. They have always had the 777-200 (which are in seriously dilapidated state) and in need of replacement. The -300 will not open new routes, but replace the existing -200s, the only advantage being an extra 100 or so seats and extra belly space. In fact, if the -200 crew cant fly the -300, it means that KQ will have to maintain three sets of crew specifically for one plane, and those are overheads.
Bingo!
- 1 plane is not a game changer as you point out. Only when the 787s come in consistently will a difference be made.
- Does KQ still have the ancient 767s? Those need to go! The 777-200 is a great plane in comparison!
- Boeings are designed in a manner that the crew that flies the 777-200 should be able to fly the 777-300 [& they would have been trained on the new plane]
- Until the staffing is sorted out, KQ will still face problems.



GG- the B772s KQ has are in great nick! The B773 could well be a game changer....think about it, they have the short range connectivity airplanes, what they lacked was a big boy, with bunks for the crew, this allows them to fly longer distances direct without the dog-legs.

yes the crew on the existing B772 can intact fly the B773 with a short course...

B788---start trickling in one by one, as they are custom made....
Gordon Gekko
#340 Posted : Sunday, October 27, 2013 9:24:19 PM
Rank: Elder

Joined: 5/27/2008
Posts: 3,760
@Horton, I used a 772 from LHR in August and wouldn't exactly say the kite was in great shape. My personal screen was hardly responsive to touch, my seat wobbled wildly during takeoff, the under carriage made a deafening noise as it retracted - not exactly a nice user experience, unless you gauge a/c fitness solely by the soundness of the engines.
1,588 Pages«<3233343536>»
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Copyright © 2026 Wazua.co.ke. All Rights Reserved.