@Alma,
I am one such warrior.My record ,and i have asked for bets here,is,UK shall attend without fail!.

There are people whose goggles don't allow them to engage soberly, even if for a minute. There is a reason the ICC Prosecutor's case is currently being handled at various international diplomatic channels in Africa and beyond on a case of a President who has cooperated all along. Having read comments here, for CORD Effect and the likes, it's pointless. Hyenas galore. Mtangoja.

Dear Members,

Time out! To remind all of us that we remain Wazuans and the diversity of our opinions is what builds the true Wazua spirit. Let our disagreements focus on issues not individual Wazuans.

The Wazua spirit

DO NOT ever imagine that a country led by the father of all idiots Allasanne Ouattara would vote in any other way.

Read more on CIV PEV and see why some African leaders want ICC to stay...TO SETTLE SCORES WITH OPPONENETS!!!

Chief Idiot Ouattara started a war which killed many, Gbagbo's people killed too but today, in one of the most glaring examples of the uselessness of OTP at ICC, Gbagbo is facing charges while NO INVESTIGATIONS were conducted on Ouattara.

But I give credit to Ouattara, he is consistent in his pro-ICC stand, though not for the same reason as maybe Botswana. Just start investigating him and the song will change!

To avoid misrepresentation, my position with Kenya and not Jubilee or CORD as the consideration, is either of the following:

1.That the democratically elected President of Kenya, Mr Uhuru Kenyatta should only attend this trial when physically required specifically reading of charges and ruling.

For any other occasion, his defense team would adequately represent him and if he wants to, he can use Trancend to catch on/participate electronically with the proceedings.

This is exactly what he has done by filing a legal submission weeks back. However, the court is yet to rule on this.

It's inexplicable that the court has decided to rule on this when it feels like with the Nov date looming for the Kenyan Head Of State (context to this happening is the court responding to Gladwell Otieno ASAP on the Westgate attack) - unless of course there is more to this than meets the eye.

As of now, President Kenyatta has been cooperating and using legal tools to make his case. Why the ICC hesitation? Anyone who thinks President Kenyatta whilst in office must sit through all court sessions can stop reading here.

Given this development, I agree with the AU that President Uhuru Kenyatta should not be compelled to go to the Hague until the ICC judges rule on his legal application before his trial date to only attend sessions requiring his physical presence.

What is so complex with that request from a busy democratically elected Head Of State?

My anticipated outcome is that the political pressure will work. The declining Anglo-American power rates security higher than the ICC issue and will not want to be seen as being unreasonable.

This position above is based on the premise the evidence so far looks weak.

2. For the ICC insiders (Prosecution), if the evidence is compelling in their view, they should defer these cases until the President completes his term(s) as the Kenyan constitution has a term limit and arresting a seating head of state who has willingly showed up at the Hague has grave or unpredictable repercussions.

I hold position (1) given the 'evidence' thus far.